2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.01.154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser surface modification of PEEK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
82
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, other laser wavelengths were studied with the aim to evaluate their effect on the surface modification of PEEK [44,47,48]. So far, surface functionalization of PEEK by means of LST has been successfully achieved using laser wavelengths ranging from UV (355 nm) to middle infrared (MIR) (10.6 µm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, other laser wavelengths were studied with the aim to evaluate their effect on the surface modification of PEEK [44,47,48]. So far, surface functionalization of PEEK by means of LST has been successfully achieved using laser wavelengths ranging from UV (355 nm) to middle infrared (MIR) (10.6 µm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riveiro et al compared the effect of the three ns laser irradiation wavelengths (355, 532, and 1,064 nm) on the roughness, and contact angle of PEEK substrates, properties directly related to the cell viability on implants [44]. In order to enhance its adhesion properties, an increase on the wettability was sought.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past decades, different additives, except the modification of surface properties [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], were added into PEEK or PI to improve tribological properties. Many researchers conducted various experiments to investigate the friction coefficient and wear rate of various conditions, providing comprehensive mechanisms of friction and wear at different conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported that surface roughness values of around 1 lm or above increase bone bonding to the implant surface [6,7]. Experimental results have shown that moderately hydrophobic surfaces promote the adsorption of the adhesive proteins that determine the attachment and spreading of cells, whereas hydrophobic or non-ionic hydrophilic surfaces inhibit the their interaction with cells [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%