“…Our understanding of past hydroclimate reconstructed by lake‐level fluctuations cannot only offer valuable insight into the underlying forcing mechanisms for hydrological variability but also help to project future hydrological trends (Chen et al, ; Hanrahan et al, ; Shuman et al, ; Street & Grove, ). Generally, variations in paleo lake levels can be reconstructed by physical approaches such as remnant geomorphologic features above present lake levels (Liu et al, ) and littoral sedimentary facies (Newby et al, ), biotic indices such as ostracod assemblages (Mischke et al, ), chironomids (Chen et al, ), and submerged plant residues (Yu, ), and geochemical indices such as carbonate content (Zhao et al, ), total organic carbon isotopes (Liu et al, ), and n ‐alkanes and alkenones (He et al, ). However, each technique has inherent strengths and weaknesses (Juggins, ; Lister et al, ; Liu et al, ) and few lake‐level indices have been reported to be universally valid.…”