2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2011.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Afternoon Dosing of Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization: A Practical Solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
19
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously reported, preplerixafor PB [CD34+] correlated well with (peak) postplerixafor [CD34+] (r = 0.78) as well as CD34+ product count (r = 0.76). Also as previously reported, prior treatment with lenalidomide did not exclude a successful collection, with all four such patients collecting more than 5 × 10 6 CD34 cells/kg.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As previously reported, preplerixafor PB [CD34+] correlated well with (peak) postplerixafor [CD34+] (r = 0.78) as well as CD34+ product count (r = 0.76). Also as previously reported, prior treatment with lenalidomide did not exclude a successful collection, with all four such patients collecting more than 5 × 10 6 CD34 cells/kg.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The 17‐ to 18‐hour post‐ to preplerixafor ratio was lower than the peak post‐ to preplerixafor ratio, but this decrease did not reach clinical significance. In addition, the median of the 17‐ to 18‐hour post–pre [CD34+] ratio, 4.0, was the same as the 15‐hour post–pre [CD34+] ratio found in an earlier retrospective study and is comparable to the median 4.6 post–pre [CD34+] ratio seen at 17 hours in the earlier MM study …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 Other groups have reported similar findings. [36][37][38] However, such a strategy requires the presence of a accredited laboratory that can perform timely CD34+ counts to facilitate decision making. Further, as there are only retrospective reports of preemptive plerixafor, and little to guide the timing of its use, there may be centre-to-centre differences with respect to the optimal peripheral blood CD34 'cutoff' before plerixafor is administered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18, 2025 However, the current schedule for plerixafor administration late in the evening prior to collection and the relatively narrow window for collecting the stem cells introduce logistical difficulties. 26 While the majority of the studies have used plerixafor by the subcutaneous route, and the current label indicates SQ route, intravenous administration has been studied in a limited fashion. Following SQ administration, plerixafor is absorbed rapidly with 70–80% bioavailability in healthy volunteer studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%