1999
DOI: 10.1038/eye.1999.241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late clouding of an acrylic intraocular lens following routine phacoemulsification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Early fogging of silicone implants 2 and late fogging of acrylic implants 3 have been previously reported in sporadic cases. More recently, [4][5][6] there have been a few reports of late surface opacification of hydrogel implants of different manufacturers from centres in Europe, Canada, Australia and the Far East.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early fogging of silicone implants 2 and late fogging of acrylic implants 3 have been previously reported in sporadic cases. More recently, [4][5][6] there have been a few reports of late surface opacification of hydrogel implants of different manufacturers from centres in Europe, Canada, Australia and the Far East.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was this SC-60B-0UV (DGR incorporated, Medical Developmental Research, Inc., USA) in which we, as previously reported by others, noted a high incidence of postoperative opacification. 1 This report presents a retrospective assessment of this complication 4 years after surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They included surface deposition of calcium and phosphate, as in the Hydroview IOL (Bausch & Lomb Surgical) and MemoryLens IOL (Ciba Vision); within the substance of the optic, as in the SC60B-OUV IOL (MDR) IOL; or a combination of both, as in the AquaSense IOL (OII). [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] However, the overall pattern of opacification within a given IOL design (with all the lenses being manufactured from the same IOL material) was generally the same. In the cases reported here, pathologic analyses suggested the presence of calcium/phosphate as part of the deposit composition and can therefore be considered dystrophic calcification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opacification patterns included the formation of surface deposits as well as intralenticular deposition of hydroxyapatite. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] We present 2 cases of hydrophilic acrylic IOLs (Stabibag and Bigbag, Ioltech) that had to be explanted because of late postoperative opacification of their optic component, causing significant visual symptoms. In both cases, the lens opacification was caused by dystrophic calcification, but the pattern of calcium deposition on the 2 IOLs was different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%