The Cambridge History of Latin America 1984
DOI: 10.1017/chol9780521245166.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late colonial Brazil, 1750–1808

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time, there were 139 engenhos in Bahia (Schwartz 1985), corresponding to almost 8,000 slaves 17 . Alden (1984) cites 286 plantations in Pernambuco-Paraíba; by my calculation, there would have been over 16,000 slaves. In 1775, only 1.4 million arrobas of sugar were produced across Brazil (Burlamaqui), with 35,000 slaves possibly employed.…”
Section: The Gold Eramentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…At the time, there were 139 engenhos in Bahia (Schwartz 1985), corresponding to almost 8,000 slaves 17 . Alden (1984) cites 286 plantations in Pernambuco-Paraíba; by my calculation, there would have been over 16,000 slaves. In 1775, only 1.4 million arrobas of sugar were produced across Brazil (Burlamaqui), with 35,000 slaves possibly employed.…”
Section: The Gold Eramentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As with sugar, gold production had large demographic effects. I calculate average gold output by decade for Minas Gerais based on Noya Pinto (1979), as reprinted in Alden (1984). Supposing that available population figures are correct: there were about 30,000 African slaves in Minas Gerais in the 1710s (Russell-Wood 1987); an average 98,730 and 93,328 registered slaves in the 1730s and 1740s ( Codice Costa Matoso ; in Boxer 1962); and an African/Mulatto population of 243,000 in the 1770s, and 369,000 in the 1790s (Alden 1963).…”
Section: The Gold Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sugar production figures are compiled from Alden, ‘Late colonial Brazil’, pp. 630–1; Soares, Notas estatísticas , pp.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%