“…Thus, one would predict that any manipulation of the familiarity dimension would result in changes in both the amphtude and latency of the P300, Several ERP experiments have been devoted to determining the relationship between measures of P300 and memory processes. In the Stemberg paradigm (1969), P300 latency varies with memory search time in the same way as RT: P300 latency in-set (target) items have shorter latencies than outset (distractor) items (Adam & Collins, 1978;Ford, Roth, Mohs, Hopkins, & Kopell, 1979;Ford et al, 1980;Gomer, Spicuzza, & O'Donnell, 1976). Moreover, Ford et al, (1980) reported that while changes in stimulus discriminability (i,e,, normal vs, degraded stimuli) do not affect the slopes of the RT and P300 latency functions, the intercepts for both measures increased for the degraded stimuli (cf Sternberg, 1969), P300 amplitude differences have also been observed in this paradigm.…”