2016
DOI: 10.1127/zdgg/2016/0068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Cretaceous inversion of the NW segment of the Mid-Polish Trough – how marginal troughs were formed, and does it matter at all?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many concordant and discordant salt structures particularly in the Lower Saxony Basin, in the eNGB and in the marginal parts of the Mid‐Polish Trough reached their phase of main activity during the Late Cretaceous (e.g. Jähne, Hoffmann, Kley, & Dunkl, ; Krzywiec & Stachowska, ; Mazur, Scheck‐Wenderoth, & Krzywiec, ; Otto, ; Figure d). Furthermore, salt‐cored anticlines, which were initiated during the Late Cretaceous, for example, in the southern eNGB, probably reached the phase of main activity at the same time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many concordant and discordant salt structures particularly in the Lower Saxony Basin, in the eNGB and in the marginal parts of the Mid‐Polish Trough reached their phase of main activity during the Late Cretaceous (e.g. Jähne, Hoffmann, Kley, & Dunkl, ; Krzywiec & Stachowska, ; Mazur, Scheck‐Wenderoth, & Krzywiec, ; Otto, ; Figure d). Furthermore, salt‐cored anticlines, which were initiated during the Late Cretaceous, for example, in the southern eNGB, probably reached the phase of main activity at the same time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the boundaries of the Mid‐Polish Trough, salt structures were either formed due to thin‐skinned extension decoupled from graben faults during the Triassic or Jurassic or, due to tectonic shortening transmitted along a salt detachment from the inverted basin centre during the Late Cretaceous (e.g. Dadlez, ; Krzywiec, , , ; Krzywiec & Stachowska, ; Wagner et al., ; Widera, Ćwikliński, & Karman, ).…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, if the basin fill is very homogenous as in the case of the up to 2500 m thick marlstones of the Subhercynian and Münsterland basins, detection of growth strata is nearly impossible. Krzywiec and Stachowska (2016) argued for a structure in the Polish trough that the observed higher total thickness of Upper Cretaceous strata only reflects folding at the margin of the inverted structure and erosional truncation, not increased subsidence in a marginal trough. The distinction between these two cases is only possible if thickness trends of single units are detectable.…”
Section: Growth Strata and Progressive Unconformitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They were explained by relaxation of the lithosphere and taken as a marker for the end of inversion tectonics already in the Maastrichtian (Nielsen et al, 2005). Krzywiec and Stachowska (2016), emphasizing that such a shift is not known from the inverted Polish basin, challenged this idea. Nevertheless, the described example at the southern flank of the Polish swell shows a remarkable hiatus below an unconformity overlain by Eocene post-inversion deposits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, shortening structures of small magnitude are widespread in the German uplands. Mesozoic structures in the Southern Permian Basin and the northern Alpine Molasse basin are sealed by an extensive cover of locally latest Cretaceous but mostly Cenozoic sediments (Bachmann et al, 1987;Baldschuhn et al, 2001; Krzywiec and Stachowska, 2016;Voigt et al, this issue).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%