2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264092
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late date of human arrival to North America: Continental scale differences in stratigraphic integrity of pre-13,000 BP archaeological sites

Abstract: By 13,000 BP human populations were present across North America, but the exact date of arrival to the continent, especially areas south of the continental ice sheets, remains unclear. Here we examine patterns in the stratigraphic integrity of early North American sites to gain insight into the timing of first colonization. We begin by modeling stratigraphic mixing of multicomponent archaeological sites to identify signatures of stratigraphic integrity in vertical artifact distributions. From those simulations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Australasia, Nearctic and Neotropic realms, which have better established and later human arrival dates 129 , 130 , compared to the Indo-Malay and Palearctic 131 , we estimated extinction dates based on truncated exponential decays after first human arrival. We used a Clovis-culture human arrival date for the Nearctic 130 , even though there is evidence of earlier human arrival 132 , 133 , as no consensus has been reached among archaeologists about the date of initial human arrival to the Americas (and evidence of human arrival south of the ice sheets is fragmented), but all agree that human populations were distributed across the North American continent by the Clovis period 134 , implying greater human influence at this point. We modelled 75% of extinctions to occur within 2000 years of first human arrival (half-life of 1000 years), based on the extinction chronology of North American Pleistocene mammals 127 , and truncated the exponential distributions so that 100% of extinctions occurred at the 90 th quantile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Australasia, Nearctic and Neotropic realms, which have better established and later human arrival dates 129 , 130 , compared to the Indo-Malay and Palearctic 131 , we estimated extinction dates based on truncated exponential decays after first human arrival. We used a Clovis-culture human arrival date for the Nearctic 130 , even though there is evidence of earlier human arrival 132 , 133 , as no consensus has been reached among archaeologists about the date of initial human arrival to the Americas (and evidence of human arrival south of the ice sheets is fragmented), but all agree that human populations were distributed across the North American continent by the Clovis period 134 , implying greater human influence at this point. We modelled 75% of extinctions to occur within 2000 years of first human arrival (half-life of 1000 years), based on the extinction chronology of North American Pleistocene mammals 127 , and truncated the exponential distributions so that 100% of extinctions occurred at the 90 th quantile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaving this debate aside, there is a general consensus that, around 14,000–13,000 cal yr BP, several areas of the Americas were populated ([ 4 , 14 , 23 26 ], but see [ 27 ]), and it is plausible to speculate about an exploration phase [ 28 ] with even earlier dates. [ 14 ] propose, based on the Summed Calibrated Probability Density of radiocarbon dates, that humans arrived in South America around 15,500 cal yr BP and that the population did not grow significantly until ∼12,500 cal yr BP, following the Antarctic glaciation (see also [ 14 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several North American archaeological sites have produced possible evidence for human occupations during the LGM ( 10 , 15 , 69 , but see contrary opinions in refs. 70 and 71 ). These ages are easier to reconcile with the estimated time frames for genetic separation between Siberian and Beringian populations than the purported pre-LGM sites, but still require that humans entered the Americas prior to substantial regional deglaciation.…”
Section: Discussion: Paleoclimatic Implications For Human Migrationsmentioning
confidence: 98%