Information about long-term variations of geomagnetic field behavior, derived from paleomagnetic data, allow insight into the evolution of the deep Earth interior over geological timescales (Sprain et al., 2018). Numerical geodynamo simulations used to tie the geomagnetic field behavior to changes in the Earth's core and mantle rely on high-quality paleomagnetic data and their interpretations. However, scarce and/or ambiguous paleomagnetic data lead to controversial and highly discussed interpretations of the field behavior in time periods like the Ediacaran (e.g., Robert et al., 2017) or the Devonian (Torsvik et al., 2012).A recent rise in interest of the Ediacaran period (635-538 Ma, Xiao & Narbonne, 2020) has led to an improvement in data coverage for this time period but the reliability and ambiguity of data remain troubling. Directional data often result in apparent polar wander paths (APWPs) with rapid oscillations between two widely separated sets of poles (Abrajevitch & Van der Voo, 2010), making paleogeographic reconstructions difficult. In addition, paleointensity studies from Laurentia (Bono et al., 2019;Thallner et al., 2021) and Baltica (Shcherbakova et al., 2020) suggest a weak sustained field, fundamentally different from younger fields (Kulakov et al., 2019), with minimum paleointensity values similar to those in short-term intensity