2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Ediacaran magnetostratigraphy of Baltica: Evidence for Magnetic Field Hyperactivity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
30
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the alternative explanations for the apparent rapid polar wander, recent attention has focused on the nature of the Earth's magnetic field during the Ediacaran to Middle Cambrian. Evidence for frequent reversals of the magnetic field during this interval come from studies in Siberia (Pavlov and Gallet, 2000;Gallet et al, 2003;Shatsillo et al, 2015), Baltica (Levashova et al, 2013;Meert, 2014;Bazhenov et al, 2016) and China (Yin, 2002).…”
Section: Magnetic Field Behaviour In the Ediacaran-cambrianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the alternative explanations for the apparent rapid polar wander, recent attention has focused on the nature of the Earth's magnetic field during the Ediacaran to Middle Cambrian. Evidence for frequent reversals of the magnetic field during this interval come from studies in Siberia (Pavlov and Gallet, 2000;Gallet et al, 2003;Shatsillo et al, 2015), Baltica (Levashova et al, 2013;Meert, 2014;Bazhenov et al, 2016) and China (Yin, 2002).…”
Section: Magnetic Field Behaviour In the Ediacaran-cambrianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…today, (ii) true polar wander (TPW) events where the entire lithosphere rotates to accommodate a change in global moment of inertia, or (iii) the absence of a stable GAD field, including the possibility of an equatorial dipole or "hyper" frequent polarity reversals [Abrajevitch and Van der Voo, 2010;Halls et al, 2015;Bazhenov et al, 2016].…”
Section: 1002/2016gl068858mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these advances, however, several important discrepancies in Neoproterozoic paleogeography persist, including the history of Rodinia [Evans, 2013;Li et al, 2013] and a growing number of anomalous poles in the Ediacaran [Kirschvink et al, 1997;Abrajevitch and Van der Voo, 2010;Halls et al, 2015;Bono and Tarduno, 2015;Klein et al, 2015;Bazhenov et al, 2016] and Cryogenian [Maloof et al, 2006;Swanson-Hysell et al, 2012]. Anomalous APWPs have been interpreted as either (i) rapid plate motions much faster than any occurring…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explosion of life in the Early Cambrian period at ~530 Ma has been associated with growth of Earth's inner core, the supposed strengthening of the dipole geomagnetic field, and the resulting thickening of Earth's atmosphere (Doglioni et al, ), although there is little evidence for strengthening of the geomagnetic field at this time (e.g., Biggin et al, ). On the other hand, the Late Ediacaran and Early Cambrian periods (~550 and ~530 Ma, respectively) may have been times of unusually high polarity reversal frequency (Bazhenov et al, ; Pavlov & Gallet, ), although precise estimates of reversal frequency are elusive due to poorly constrained age control in stratigraphic sections where the reversals were recorded. Meert et al () proposed that high reversal frequency (up to ~20 reversals/Myr) at this time would have been associated with low geomagnetic field intensity that therefore lowered shielding from UVR, which created an evolutionary advantage for burrowing and shelled organisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%