1998
DOI: 10.2307/4003573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Growing-Season Fire Effects in Mid-Successional Tallgrass Prairies

Abstract: Wildfire in the growing season is relatively frequent and interest is increasing in using growing-season fm in management of tallgrass prairie. However, the influence of fue in the growing season on forage production and species composition, especially in mid-successional tallgrass prairie, is largely unknown. Our objective was to compare vegetation composition and production on Loamy Prairie and Very Shallow ecological sites in mid-successional stages in response tu late growing-season fire at different frequ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…plants m À2 ) in July 1994 after winter or summer fires in 1991, 1992, and 1993 in south Texas, but it was not determined whether this was a significant difference. Engle et al (1998) found that a latesummer fire decreased C 3 grass (primarily Texas wintergrass) production for up to 3 years post-fire on a loamy site in Oklahoma. However, on a very shallow site, Texas wintergrass response was similar to our study: production decreased the first year post-fire, but increased over the no fire treatment by 3 years post-fire.…”
Section: Experiments 1-fire Only Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…plants m À2 ) in July 1994 after winter or summer fires in 1991, 1992, and 1993 in south Texas, but it was not determined whether this was a significant difference. Engle et al (1998) found that a latesummer fire decreased C 3 grass (primarily Texas wintergrass) production for up to 3 years post-fire on a loamy site in Oklahoma. However, on a very shallow site, Texas wintergrass response was similar to our study: production decreased the first year post-fire, but increased over the no fire treatment by 3 years post-fire.…”
Section: Experiments 1-fire Only Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several studies of summer fire in the Tallgrass Prairie of the United States found a decline in C 4 grass production during the first year after a summer fire but also found a recovery to preburn or unburned control levels by the second or third year (Engle et al 1998;Engle and Bidwell 2001). The slower recovery of sideoats grama at our mixed-grass prairie site following summer fire, compared with what is typically found in the Tallgrass Prairie (Engle and Bidwell 2001), is likely due to the greater aridity and variability in precipitation events at our study site compared with Tallgrass Prairie sites.…”
Section: (3) May 2006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the climatic conditions, aboveground phytomass production of burned rangeland can normally take at least two growing seasons for full recovery (Table 1). According to Engle et al (1998), the growing-season burns in consecutive years had little influence on production as compared to a single burn in two years in the tall grass prairies (rainfall 750 to 900 mm) of south-central Oklahoma. The reason for these findings is unclear and need future in depth research.…”
Section: H a Snymanmentioning
confidence: 98%