2017
DOI: 10.1111/bor.12264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Holocene palaeoproductivity changes: a multi‐proxy study in the Norwegian Trench and the Skagerrak, North Sea

Abstract: To detect climatic linkages between the Baltic Sea, the Skagerrak and the Nordic Seas, we present multi‐proxy reconstructions covering the last 4500 years from three sediment cores taken in the Skagerrak and along the SW Norwegian margin. Foraminiferal assemblages at all three sites show a distinct change at c. 1700 years BP, associated with a transition from absence and rare occurrence of Brizalina skagerrakensis during c. 4500–2300 years BP to its subsequent abundance increase, suggesting a stronger influenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(263 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition we evaluate our results in context of the long-term productivity changes described previously in Polovodova Asteman et al (2018). 20…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition we evaluate our results in context of the long-term productivity changes described previously in Polovodova Asteman et al (2018). 20…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although the Skagerrak is a well-investigated area, retrospective studies from this region have focused on climate 30 change instead of productivity, and hence, past primary productivity changes are not well known (Polovodova Asteman et al, 2018). Previous studies suggested that among the processes driving primary productivity changes in the Skagerrak are 1) the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), 2) an input of anthropogenic nutrients from the Skagerrak catchment area and 3) nutrients Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org /10.5194/bg-2018-94 Manuscript under review for journal Biogeosciences Discussion started: 5 March 2018 c Author(s) 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations