2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04805-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late-life targeting of the IGF-1 receptor improves healthspan and lifespan in female mice

Abstract: Diminished growth factor signaling improves longevity in laboratory models, while a reduction in the somatotropic axis is favorably linked to human aging and longevity. Given the conserved role of this pathway on lifespan, therapeutic strategies, such as insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) monoclonal antibodies (mAb), represent a promising translational tool to target human aging. To this end, we performed a preclinical study in 18-mo-old male and female mice treated with vehicle or an IGF-1R mAb (L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
92
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(81 reference statements)
6
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research will be required to distinguish between these possibilities and to determine the role of IGF‐1 in the metabolic effects we observed. Reduced signaling through the growth hormone/IGF‐1 axis due to genetic mutations or caloric restriction is associated with increased healthspan and lifespan in model organisms (Mao et al, ; Milman, Huffman, & Barzilai, ). These results support the idea that the early‐onset obesity observed in Rictor Nkx2.1−/− mice and the higher circulating level of IGF‐1 could have a combined long‐term negative impact on health and lifespan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research will be required to distinguish between these possibilities and to determine the role of IGF‐1 in the metabolic effects we observed. Reduced signaling through the growth hormone/IGF‐1 axis due to genetic mutations or caloric restriction is associated with increased healthspan and lifespan in model organisms (Mao et al, ; Milman, Huffman, & Barzilai, ). These results support the idea that the early‐onset obesity observed in Rictor Nkx2.1−/− mice and the higher circulating level of IGF‐1 could have a combined long‐term negative impact on health and lifespan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total protein was mechanically homogenized and extracted with denaturing lysis buffer (150mM NaCl, 50mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.25% DOC, 5mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1mM orthovanadate, 100mM NaF, 5mM Na Pyrophosphate, 1× PIC, and 100uM PMSF) and protein content was determined using the BCA protein assay (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) with BSA as a standard, as described (Mao et al, 2018). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE using Bis-Tris stain-free gels (BioRad, Hercules, CA), and total protein was imaged and quantified to confirm equal loading.…”
Section: Star⋆methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In additional to this smaller lifeextension, reduced IGF1 signalling also appears to have a greater effect on female lifespan than that of males, an effect that has been observed across several different manipulations of the IGF1 pathway, including heterozygous deletion of the IGFR receptor (IGF1R+/-) [29][30][31], conditional knockout of hepatic IGF1 production [32], mice with a hypomorphic IGF1 gene that have low expression levels of IGF1 [33], and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A knockout mice, which show a decrease in IGF1 availability [34]. In addition to observed lifespan effects, improvements in late-life function are observed in female mice treated with an antibody that antagonizes IGF1R [35], but not males, and female IGF1R+/mice show increased paraquat resistance in adulthood but males do not [29,30]. A sex-specificity in the GH-IGF1 pathway for lifespan responses may also be manifest by manipulations further downstream, since disrupted expression of insulin-receptor substrate 2, which transduces information from IGF1R, extends lifespan in females but not males [36] (although the authors acknowledge this may be a consequence of sample size).…”
Section: How Do We Know a Manipulation Has A Sex-specific Effect?mentioning
confidence: 99%