2006
DOI: 10.1017/s0954102006000113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Miocene Asterozoans (Echinodermata) in the James Ross Island Volcanic Group

Abstract: Asterozoans (Echinodermata) of Late Miocene age (6.02 ± 0.12 Ma) are preserved as external moulds in water-lain tuffs of the James Ross Island Volcanic Group (JRIVG), James Ross Island, Antarctic Peninsula. The asterozoans are complete, and appear to represent specimens suffocated after having been pinioned by rapid sedimentation on the distal fringe of an erupting sub-aqueous tuff cone. Although the coarse nature of the host sediments has obliterated the fine morphological detail of the specimens, at least on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we report new geochemical data and results from our recent study of hyaloclastite breccias from James Ross Island, Antarctica (Figure 1). Field observations of the volcanic sequences on the island suggest that both submarine and subglacial eruptions occurred during the Neogene (<6.5 Ma [ Smellie , 1999; Williams et al , 2006] and unpublished data of the authors), although with a majority subglacial [ Smellie , 2006]. It is therefore an ideal place to make a comparative study of the influence of alteration environments on authigenic mineral compositions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we report new geochemical data and results from our recent study of hyaloclastite breccias from James Ross Island, Antarctica (Figure 1). Field observations of the volcanic sequences on the island suggest that both submarine and subglacial eruptions occurred during the Neogene (<6.5 Ma [ Smellie , 1999; Williams et al , 2006] and unpublished data of the authors), although with a majority subglacial [ Smellie , 2006]. It is therefore an ideal place to make a comparative study of the influence of alteration environments on authigenic mineral compositions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no evidence, as fossils or sediments, for marine conditions during the tuff cone eruptions (cf. Williams et al 2006;Nelson et al 2009). Although a marine setting cannot be disproven at present, at least for those tuff cones that crop out at low elevations close to and at present sea level, the generally minor modification of the landforms implies that in each case they were rapidly buried by other volcanic products before wave erosion was able to modify them (Cas et al 1989;Godchaux et al 1992;White 1996).…”
Section: Sequence Type 2-englacial Domes and Lava Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of well-preserved ophiuroids in the fossil record is the result of catastrophic burial by obrution events (sensu Brett, 1990) where large pulses of sediment rapidly smother benthic communities, permanently shielding them from decay and scavengers and preventing the escape of mobile taxa (Brett and Baird, 1986;Speyer and Brett, 1991;Brett et al, 1997). Fossil ophiuroid beds have been described from the Ordovician to Cenozoic (Spencer, 1950;Aronson, 1989;Mikulas et al, 1995;Donovan et al, 1996;Radwanski, 2002;Kutscher and Villier, 2003;Salamon et al, 2003;Twitchett et al, 2005;Williams et al, 2006;Hunter et al, 2007;Shroat-Lewis, 2007;Zatoń et al, 2008;Martínez et al, 2010;Thuy, 2011;Rousseau and Nakrem, 2012;Thuy et al, 2013;Jagt et al, 2014). Aronson (1989) and references therein, relates the decline in the distribution of dense ophiuroid assemblages in the late Mesozoic and Cenozoic to the rise in durophagous and to an abrupt increase in bioturbation ("biological bulldozing") during the late Mesozoic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%