2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Miocene evolution of the eastern Deep Algarve basin: Interaction of bottom currents and gravitational processes in a foredeep setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During deposition of Units III and II in the latest Messinian-Early Pliocene (5.78 to >4.52 Ma), an important change in the depositional style with respect to Unit IV took place, with the development of hemipelagic deposits, and with very occasional, very fine grained turbidites not affected by bottom currents. This result agrees with the previous interpretation for the upper part of the Messinian in the Gulf of Cádiz that proposed hemipelagic sedimentation during the late Messinian and no significant MOW influx during the earliest Pliocene (e.g., Llave et al, 2011;Expedition 339 Scientists, 2013;Hernández-Molina et al, 2016), but at Site U1610 it appears that this change happened earlier than previously documented based on seismic data from the same area (Ng et al, 2022). However, this hypothesis for the lack of bottom water current reworking and contourite deposition is contrary to other authors who consider a MOW influence since the Miocene/Pliocene boundary (e.g., Nelson et al, 1999).…”
Section: Lithostratigraphysupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During deposition of Units III and II in the latest Messinian-Early Pliocene (5.78 to >4.52 Ma), an important change in the depositional style with respect to Unit IV took place, with the development of hemipelagic deposits, and with very occasional, very fine grained turbidites not affected by bottom currents. This result agrees with the previous interpretation for the upper part of the Messinian in the Gulf of Cádiz that proposed hemipelagic sedimentation during the late Messinian and no significant MOW influx during the earliest Pliocene (e.g., Llave et al, 2011;Expedition 339 Scientists, 2013;Hernández-Molina et al, 2016), but at Site U1610 it appears that this change happened earlier than previously documented based on seismic data from the same area (Ng et al, 2022). However, this hypothesis for the lack of bottom water current reworking and contourite deposition is contrary to other authors who consider a MOW influence since the Miocene/Pliocene boundary (e.g., Nelson et al, 1999).…”
Section: Lithostratigraphysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Expedition 339 drilled the top of the MTU at Site U1387 and recovered hemipelagic sediments (Expedition 339 Scientists, 2013). Beneath this we anticipated a migrating channel fill succession, below which is an unconformity and a succession of dipping bright reflectors (Ng et al, 2022). Beneath this is a package of parallel-bedded, lower amplitude reflectors that is thought to be of Tortonian age.…”
Section: Site U1610mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Disruption of the connection between the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic led the Mediterranean to become a marginal sea (Flecker et al, 2015). Between ~ 11.6 and 7.2 Ma, following the convergent phase, two main corridors formed south of Spain (Betic) and north of Morocco (Rifean) to allow MOW overflow into the Atlantic (Capella et al, 2017(Capella et al, , 2019Krijgsman et al, 1999;de Weger et al, 2020Ng et al, 2021Ng et al, , 2022. During the late Messinian, shallowing/closure of these corridors produced the Messinian Salinity Crisis (MSC) between 5.97 and 5.33 Ma, and associated late Miocene cooling (Hsü et al, 1973;CIESM, 2008;Roveri et al, 2014;Flecker et al, 2015;Herbert et al, 2016;Krijgsman et al, 1999).…”
Section: Middle To Late Miocene: Indian Gateway Closure and The Incep...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the MSC, a complex combination of tectonic activity and/or changes in the glacio‐eustatic sea level led to the progressive isolation of the Mediterranean Sea and, once isolated, was very sensitive on the rainfall input. As a result of the MSC, the Mediterranean Outflow Water (MOW) influx into the Atlantic Ocean was severely reduced or ceased (Ng et al., 2022) allowing the formation of a hypersaline deposits (gypsum and halite, salinity >360 g/kg) from ∼5.9 to ∼5.6 Ma (Roveri et al., 2014). This restriction is suggested to have slowed down the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) by ∼15% (Rogerson et al., 2012) as MOW provides considerable amounts of the salinity needed for the formation of North Atlantic Deep Water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%