2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Neanderthal subsistence strategies and cultural traditions in the northern Iberia Peninsula: Insights from Prado Vargas, Burgos, Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study demonstrates that boomerangs curated in museum collections could possibly be associated with a new function -in this case, with retouching lithic tools -when re-examined using newly acquired or geographically removed methodologies and understandings. The relationship between stigmata appearance and lithic edge characteristics remains a poorly investigated topic (though see Alonso-García et al, 2020;Martellotta et al, 2020Martellotta et al, , 2021Ruiz et al, 2021;Turner et al, 2020), as it could be influenced by several technological and/or cultural factors. Moreover, it is problematic to associate a single retoucher to a specific type of retouched lithic tool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study demonstrates that boomerangs curated in museum collections could possibly be associated with a new function -in this case, with retouching lithic tools -when re-examined using newly acquired or geographically removed methodologies and understandings. The relationship between stigmata appearance and lithic edge characteristics remains a poorly investigated topic (though see Alonso-García et al, 2020;Martellotta et al, 2020Martellotta et al, , 2021Ruiz et al, 2021;Turner et al, 2020), as it could be influenced by several technological and/or cultural factors. Moreover, it is problematic to associate a single retoucher to a specific type of retouched lithic tool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological studies of percussion retouch have been carried out for decades in European contexts. A higher level of preservation of organic materials in this continent provides a framework for the use of bone retouchers across different regions from 500ky BP (Roberts & Parfitt, 1999) to the advent of the Metal Ages (Blasco et al, 2013;d'Errico & Henshilwood, 2007;Doyon et al, 2018;Henri-Martin, 1910;Henshilwood et al, 2001;Jéquier et al, 2018;Julien et al, 2015;Martellotta et al, 2020;Rosell et al, 2011Rosell et al, , 2018Ruiz et al, 2021;Semenov & Thompson, 1964;Tartar, 2012;Turner et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2018; for a complete overview see Hutson et al, 2018). These studies found that bone retouchers were opportunistic tools: most retouchers being manufactured from bone shaft fragments obtained from the upper and lower limbs of large ungulates following the butchering of the animal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, genome analyses indicated that the later Neanderthals were probably not replaced by AMH, but genetically absorbed by them, and then the Neanderthal genes were progressively diluted from the Upper Palaeolithic gene pool due to their lower reproductive rate and later by progressive population replacements with lower Neanderthal ancestry (Lalueza-Fox, 2021). Either way, there is evidence of coexistence and hybridisation between AMH and Neanderthals in the Near and Middle East, as well as a hybridisation with Denisovan hominins (Navazo Ruiz et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although Mi. arvalis is not found at present in the studied zone, its presence has been registered during the Pleistocene and Holocene in geographic expansions linked to cold episodes, such as MIS 2 or Greenland and Heinrich Stadials (e.g., García-Ibaibarriaga et al, 2012Laplana et al, 2017;Álvarez-Vena et al, 2021), alternating with regressions linked to warm periods, such as MIS 3 interstadials (Álvarez-Vena et al, 2021), when the populations were restricted to sites with a more continental climate (e.g., López-García et al, 2011;García-Ibaibarriaga et al, 2015a, 2015bRey-Rodríguez et al, 2016;Navazo Ruiz et al, 2021). As it is a species of continental affinities (Dienske, 1979;Nores, 1989;Paupério et al, 2012;Álvarez-Vena et al, 2021), its presence in a site with an oceanic climate where it is not found nowadays, suggests that Level 0 was accumulated under cooler conditions than the current.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%