2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Outcomes Following Hypofractionated Conformal Radiotherapy vs. Standard Fractionation for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Nonrandomized Contemporary Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, although there is no doubt that HF offers major potential advantages to patients and to the economy of health systems, their development should not be at the expense of a lower likelihood of tumour control as well as of an unacceptable late toxicity. Published data shows that HF protocols seem not to be associated with an unacceptable late toxicity as documented by our [12] and other groups [7][8][9][10][11][13][14][15]. The analysis carried out in the present study provides some clinical evidence to further justify trends already emerging toward HF conformal technology in clinically localized prostate cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, although there is no doubt that HF offers major potential advantages to patients and to the economy of health systems, their development should not be at the expense of a lower likelihood of tumour control as well as of an unacceptable late toxicity. Published data shows that HF protocols seem not to be associated with an unacceptable late toxicity as documented by our [12] and other groups [7][8][9][10][11][13][14][15]. The analysis carried out in the present study provides some clinical evidence to further justify trends already emerging toward HF conformal technology in clinically localized prostate cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, at the present the main concern is the uncertainty about normal tissue toxicity of such HF protocols. Although clinical reports [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] have found acceptable levels of morbidity and reasonable PSA control rates using doses of 2.5-3 Gy, clinical data are sparse and, although promising, require further validation. If the hypothesis that the prostate cancer α / β ratio is lower than normal tissue is correct, then the optimal fractional dose is likely to be even higher than the doses tested thus far, but if incorrect, the result may be increased normal tissue toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the Beaumont trial, outcome was favorable or similar to the large non-ART trials using similar prescription delivered with 3DCRT [16,108,109,110] or IMRT [16,111,110] but toxicity was generally higher in the Beaumont trial [16,111,110]. Non-ART with gold marker-based set-up has indicated further improvement in toxicity to be possible [112,113]. For the more recent implementations of adaptations in prostate as well as bladder cancer, longer follow-up is needed to assess the potential clinical gain of ART.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Four studies reporting outcome data for early stage prostate cancer treated with CF-EBRT with a combined patient cohort of n=1778 were included in this review (27)(28)(29)(30). This cohort consisted of 407 low-risk, 1,111 intermediate-risk and 254 high-risk patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%