2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2022.106816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Paleocene – Middle Eocene magmatic flare-up in western Anatolia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Sisdağı Pluton (41 Ma, Karslı et al 2012), Erik Granitoid (42 Ma, Sipahi et al 2017), Kaletaş Pluton (44 Ma; Arslan & Aslan, 2006), Karadağ Diorite (44 Ma, Sipahi et al 2022) and Bayburt Plutons (44–45 Ma; Eyüboğlu et al 2017) are some other examples of this group in the surrounding region. Interestingly, while the Eocene magmatic activity in northwest Anatolia is mostly between 54 and 45 Ma (Okay et al 2022), there is a significant number of the plutonic activities in the Sakarya Zone ranging in age predominantly from 46 to 36 Ma (Fig. 11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Sisdağı Pluton (41 Ma, Karslı et al 2012), Erik Granitoid (42 Ma, Sipahi et al 2017), Kaletaş Pluton (44 Ma; Arslan & Aslan, 2006), Karadağ Diorite (44 Ma, Sipahi et al 2022) and Bayburt Plutons (44–45 Ma; Eyüboğlu et al 2017) are some other examples of this group in the surrounding region. Interestingly, while the Eocene magmatic activity in northwest Anatolia is mostly between 54 and 45 Ma (Okay et al 2022), there is a significant number of the plutonic activities in the Sakarya Zone ranging in age predominantly from 46 to 36 Ma (Fig. 11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the region had a magmatic arc position in the Late Cretaceous and evolved into a syn to post-collisional setting in the Eocene, precise determination of the ages of the igneous rocks is of great importance. This discrimination becomes much more important when considering that the Late Cretaceous plutonic bodies were intruded later by magmas of the middle Eocene plutonic bodies in the inner-arc setting (Dokuz et al Interestingly, while the Eocene magmatic activity in northwest Anatolia is mostly between 54 and 45 Ma (Okay et al 2022), there is a significant number of the plutonic activities in the Sakarya Zone ranging in age predominantly from 46 to 36 Ma (Fig. 11).…”
Section: A Age Of the Plutonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cenozoic ductile shear zones described in the Eocene granites from the Marmara Island from the northern margin of the Kapıdağ peninsula (Figure 2) could represent segments of this sinistral fault (Figure 2). Both of these granites have middle Eocene (48–47 Ma) crystallization (Okay et al., 2022) and Oligocene (33 and 27 Ma) AFT ages (Zattin et al., 2010). The shear zone on the northern margin of the Kapıdağ peninsula is described either as sinistral (Aksoy, 1998) or dextral (Türkoğlu et al., 2016).…”
Section: Rotational Mode Of Opening Of the Thrace Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%