2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1502-3885.2008.00064.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Pleistocene glacial history of Jameson Land, central East Greenland, derived from cosmogenic10Be and26Al exposure dating

Abstract: Previous work has presented contrasting views of the last glaciation on Jameson Land, central East Greenland, and still there is debate about whether the area was: (i) ice‐free, (ii) covered with a local non‐erosive ice cap(s), or (iii) overridden by the Greenland Ice Sheet during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Here, we use cosmogenic exposure ages from erratics to reconcile these contrasting views. A total of 43 erratics resting on weathered sandstone and on sediment‐covered surfaces were sampled from four a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4A), but they stress that this is most probably a minimum scenario, given that some of the deposits may be recessional features formed during retreat of the ice margin rather than when it was at its largest. Other authors have favoured a scenario with more extensive LGM ice cover in this area (Ó Cofaigh et al, 2004;Håkansson et al, 2007Håkansson et al, , 2009, arguing that areas previously interpreted as being ice-free based on weathering limits could rather have been covered by cold based, non-erosive ice during the LGM, an interpretation that seems likely in light of new results from west Greenland (Corbett et al, 2013;Roberts et al, 2013;Lane et al, 2014;Winsor, 2014;Winsor et al, 2015).…”
Section: Last Glacial Maximum Ice Extent and Timing Of Initial Retreatmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…4A), but they stress that this is most probably a minimum scenario, given that some of the deposits may be recessional features formed during retreat of the ice margin rather than when it was at its largest. Other authors have favoured a scenario with more extensive LGM ice cover in this area (Ó Cofaigh et al, 2004;Håkansson et al, 2007Håkansson et al, , 2009, arguing that areas previously interpreted as being ice-free based on weathering limits could rather have been covered by cold based, non-erosive ice during the LGM, an interpretation that seems likely in light of new results from west Greenland (Corbett et al, 2013;Roberts et al, 2013;Lane et al, 2014;Winsor, 2014;Winsor et al, 2015).…”
Section: Last Glacial Maximum Ice Extent and Timing Of Initial Retreatmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This bedrock sample is interpreted as containing 10 Be from a previous period of exposure (e.g. Briner et al, 2008;Håkansson et al, 2009) and is excluded from further analysis. A paired bedrock sample (BS1104 e 13.6 ± 0.8 ka) from the same location is also excluded on the basis that erosion was insufficient to remove pre-existing isotope content at this location.…”
Section: Bernstorffs Fjordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New constraints upon ice stream extent, thickness, and deglacial behaviour from the LGM to present have been established since the early 2000's both onshore (Bennike and Bjorck, 2002, Håkansson et al, 2007, Håkansson et al, 2009, Roberts et al, 2008, Roberts et al, 2009, Roberts et al, 2010, Roberts et al, 2013 and offshore (Ó Cofaigh et al, 2004, Evans et al, 2009, Dowdeswell et al, 2010. These have provided evidence for the existence of large ice streams across the West, Northeast and East Greenland continental shelves during the last glacial cycle (Lykke-Andersen, 1998, Ó Cofaigh et al, 2004, Evans et al, 2009, Dowdeswell et al, 2010.…”
Section: Introduction and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%