2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-018-2331-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Presentation and Missed Opportunities for HIV Diagnosis in Guatemala

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
8

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, limited information and structural disadvantages could explain the late diagnosis. We also found that heterosexual patients were more likely to be associated with AHD at the moment of diagnosis compared with MSM, similar to results found in other studies [ 16 , 17 ]. This is possibly due to awareness campaigns and active HIV screening programs implemented in recent years that have promoted an earlier diagnosis in MSM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, limited information and structural disadvantages could explain the late diagnosis. We also found that heterosexual patients were more likely to be associated with AHD at the moment of diagnosis compared with MSM, similar to results found in other studies [ 16 , 17 ]. This is possibly due to awareness campaigns and active HIV screening programs implemented in recent years that have promoted an earlier diagnosis in MSM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One strategy to encourage the early diagnosis of STIs is to promote testing outside the health setting 109 , 110 . Brazil again stands out for encouraging this practice in official and independent campaigns that aim not only to diagnosis but also to provide information regarding and encourage condom use 111 , 112 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deaths that occurred within 90 days of patient screening were attributed to the opportunistic infection diagnosed at the DLH. (Meléndez et al, 2019;Medina et al, 2021). As expected, the number of opportunistic infection screening samples received at the DLH from the healthcare facilities located outside of Guatemala City decreased more than the samples obtained from CFLAG, which is located in Guatemala City (43.7% vs 31.2%).…”
Section: Study Design and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%