2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late-Quaternary biogeographic scenarios for the brown bear (Ursus arctos), a wild mammal model species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

20
187
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
20
187
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data are compatible with the known phylogeographic structure in mtDNA found in Europe ( Fig. 1D): three major clades can be identified, usually called 1a (Spain and Southern Sweden), 1b (Italy, Balkans, and Southern Carpathians), and 3a (North-Eastern Europe), and usually associated with different glacial refugia and postglacial recolonization processes (36). This pattern was not observed in the nuclear genomes, and it implies a strong genetic barrier in Sweden and a strict affinity between Apennine and Alpine bears.…”
Section: Mtdna Genomessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our data are compatible with the known phylogeographic structure in mtDNA found in Europe ( Fig. 1D): three major clades can be identified, usually called 1a (Spain and Southern Sweden), 1b (Italy, Balkans, and Southern Carpathians), and 3a (North-Eastern Europe), and usually associated with different glacial refugia and postglacial recolonization processes (36). This pattern was not observed in the nuclear genomes, and it implies a strong genetic barrier in Sweden and a strict affinity between Apennine and Alpine bears.…”
Section: Mtdna Genomessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Historically, phylogenetic and phylogeographic research has relied heavily on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), with the brown bear (Ursus arctos) as an extensively studied example (Taberlet et al 1998;Purvis 2005;Davison et al 2011). Advantages of analyzing mtDNA include its high mutation rate, availability of markers, high copy number, lack of recombination, and its haploid nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polar bears exhibit low levels of population differentiation at biparentally inherited and mitochondrial markers throughout their range (Paetkau et al 1999;Cronin and MacNeil 2012;Miller et al 2012;Campagna et al 2013). Brown bears, in contrast, show considerable phylogeographic structuring at mitochondrial markers (Davison et al 2011;Edwards et al 2011;Hirata et al 2013;Keis et al 2013), and population structuring can also be discerned at biparentally inherited microsatellites (Paetkau et al 1997;Tammeleht et al 2010;Kopatz et al 2012). Most mtDNA clades are confined to certain geographical regions and are not shared between continents, although one brown bear clade is widespread throughout Eurasia and extends into North America (Korsten et al 2009;Davison et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(iii) An intriguing explanation was recently provided by Hassanin (2015), who argued that all mtDNA lineage belonging to clade 1 ( Fig. 2A; see Leonard et al 2000 andDavison et al 2011 for details about this nomenclature) should be designated as polar bear-derived. Under that hypothesis, not only the current polar bear lineages in clade 2b, but also the clades currently found in brown bear populations on the ABC islands (clade 2a) and Western Europe (clade 1) are ultimately derived from polar bears.…”
Section: (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%