2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2004.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Quaternary palaeolake levels in Tengger Desert, NW China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
110
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
110
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work has identified many shorelines and terraces in the Alxa Plateau, such as those at Zhuye Lake [4][5][6], Juyan Lake [32,33] and Jilantai Lake [1,2]. This work has confirmed and enhanced the previously published paleolake shorelines and terraces ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous work has identified many shorelines and terraces in the Alxa Plateau, such as those at Zhuye Lake [4][5][6], Juyan Lake [32,33] and Jilantai Lake [1,2]. This work has confirmed and enhanced the previously published paleolake shorelines and terraces ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…14 C results of the highest terrace of the eastern end of the Juyan Lake (located in the northwest Badan Jaran Desert) indicate that the lake levels were maximal about 33 ka BP [20]. In terms of when peak lake levels occurred, the results of these studies [4,6,20] are consistent with those of Li [14]. But in the Ulan Buh Desert, OSL data show that maximal Jilantai lake level occurred at least 50-60 ka ago.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, these characterizations have recently been challenged by data obtained from optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and uranium series dating data, which are in obvious contrast with the above radiocarbon data [7,8]. For example, sediment from the same lacustrine facies in the Tengger Desert (to the northeast of the Tibetan Plateau) date back to 25-40 ka BP [9,10] according to radiocarbon dating, but OSL dating indicated that they were from 70-130 ka (MIS 5) [8]. A similar scenario was also indicated by other published data [11][12][13], which suggests that the disagreement between the two dating methods might have been caused by the weakness of radiocarbon dating for samples older than 35 ka BP.…”
Section: Alpine Lakes In the Frigid Tibetan Plateaumentioning
confidence: 99%