2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Quaternary relative sea level in Southern California and Monterey Bay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These rates are comparable to rates similarly determined by 210 Pb and 137 Cs in Monterey Bay by Lewis et al (2002) that ranged from 0.15 to 3.9 cm/year. Moreover, these average rates are also in line with 20th century sea level rise for Monterey Bay (0.15 cm/yr) as determined from tide gage records corrected for local uplift (Reynolds and Simms, 2015), whereby sedimentation rates approximate the accommodation space created by local sea level rise. Similarly, our overall average rate for the longer core PS1410-08GC at 0.08 cm/yr is also in line with the late Holocene sea level rise estimate for Monterey Bay of 0.13 cm/yr (Reynolds and Simms, 2015).…”
Section: Age Modelssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These rates are comparable to rates similarly determined by 210 Pb and 137 Cs in Monterey Bay by Lewis et al (2002) that ranged from 0.15 to 3.9 cm/year. Moreover, these average rates are also in line with 20th century sea level rise for Monterey Bay (0.15 cm/yr) as determined from tide gage records corrected for local uplift (Reynolds and Simms, 2015), whereby sedimentation rates approximate the accommodation space created by local sea level rise. Similarly, our overall average rate for the longer core PS1410-08GC at 0.08 cm/yr is also in line with the late Holocene sea level rise estimate for Monterey Bay of 0.13 cm/yr (Reynolds and Simms, 2015).…”
Section: Age Modelssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The 14 C ages from material directly below this surface correlate well with a local relative sea-level curve (Reynolds and Simms, 2015). Where sampled, S 3 beds are only present directly below the transgressive ravinement surface and likely represent early Holocene shoreface deposits (Fig.…”
Section: Facies Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Figure 23 shows a range of proposed sea-level curves for the Santa Barbara Channel region. Our preferred curve uses the relative sea-level curve between 12 ka and the present developed by Reynolds and Simms (2015) for southern California from analysis of coastal deposits. From 21 to 12 ka, our preferred curve slightly adjusts the global curve of Stanford et al (2011) so that LGM sea level is 123 m below present.…”
Section: Post-lgm Sea-level Historymentioning
confidence: 99%