1986
DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(86)90163-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late reaction to silicone following reconstruction of an orbital floor fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mauriello et al 7 described 3 patients in whom proptosis and diplopia developed owing to cystlike encapsulation of polytef implants at 13, 16, and 20 years after surgery. Sewall et al 8 reported a similar finding in a patient treated with a silicone graft 13 years earlier. Alloplastic complications, which are infrequent and are usually reported as isolated cases, include orbital infection, implant migration, dacryocystitis, hyperophthalmia, fistula formation, visual loss, and proptosis secondary to hemorrhage into the fibrous capsule.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…Mauriello et al 7 described 3 patients in whom proptosis and diplopia developed owing to cystlike encapsulation of polytef implants at 13, 16, and 20 years after surgery. Sewall et al 8 reported a similar finding in a patient treated with a silicone graft 13 years earlier. Alloplastic complications, which are infrequent and are usually reported as isolated cases, include orbital infection, implant migration, dacryocystitis, hyperophthalmia, fistula formation, visual loss, and proptosis secondary to hemorrhage into the fibrous capsule.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…Formation of cysts have not yet been well-documented. [5][6][7] We have found reports of complications up to 13 years after implantation, 8,9 but we know of no report of an inclusion cyst that presented as late as 31 years (as this did).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…4 A similar reactive inflammatory response or a foreign body reaction may have been the cause in our case. In addition, the rod itself could have caused a purely mechanical inflammatory response while rubbing on the surrounding tissue as the globe moved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%