2002
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/17.7.1252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late referral for end-stage renal disease: a region-wide survey in the south west of England

Abstract: Nearly a quarter of patients are referred for specialist nephrology treatment at a very late stage, within 1 month of RRT. They are less likely to receive interventions that could alter the progression of CRF or reduce its associated co-morbidity, have a worse clinical state at the start of RRT, longer hospitalization and poorer survival. These differences were much less marked for those referred within 1-4 months of starting RRT, although this is an insufficient time to prepare for RRT. Further research is ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
124
2
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
11
124
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Guidelines for vascular access placement (13) might have created unintended consequences; after the access is ready for use, providers may have lower thresholds for initiating dialysis. Many retrospective cohort studies have suggested a survival benefit during the first 1 year of dialysis for patients who receive predialysis nephrology care and patients who initiate dialysis with an arteriovenous fistula or graft (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Analyses that evaluate the influence of predialysis nephrology care and dialysis access at initiation on outcomes may suffer from lead time bias; nephrologists may accelerate dialysis start dates for well-prepared patients under their care, and survival analyses that begin with dialysis initiation may show better survival in well-prepared patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidelines for vascular access placement (13) might have created unintended consequences; after the access is ready for use, providers may have lower thresholds for initiating dialysis. Many retrospective cohort studies have suggested a survival benefit during the first 1 year of dialysis for patients who receive predialysis nephrology care and patients who initiate dialysis with an arteriovenous fistula or graft (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). Analyses that evaluate the influence of predialysis nephrology care and dialysis access at initiation on outcomes may suffer from lead time bias; nephrologists may accelerate dialysis start dates for well-prepared patients under their care, and survival analyses that begin with dialysis initiation may show better survival in well-prepared patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LR in adults is common with estimates of between 20% and 50% (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15), and has been shown to adversely affect dialysis access (3,7,9), hemoglobin levels (3,4,9), and choice of modality at the start of RRT (3,5,8), as well as being associated with poorer survival (4,5,7,9) and prolonged hospital stay (8). LR will also delay listing for transplantation as work-up is delayed and reduce the chance of pre-emptive transplantation (16,17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Awareness of CKD remains unacceptably low, despite recent attempts to increase awareness through dissemination of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations for patients with CKD or its risk factors to providers [20][21][22], including community awareness events such as World Kidney Day [23,24]. Earlier recognition of CKD can slow the progression of CKD, prevent complications, and reduce cardiovascular-related outcomes; additionally, early referral to a nephrologist has been shown to improve outcomes for those who progress to end-stage renal disease [27][28][29][30]. It has been observed that physicians other than nephrologists are less …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%