2023
DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.7425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late small bowel perforation from a migrated double plastic biliary stent: A case report and a review of literature of 85 cases from 2000 to 2022

Ibraheem M. Alkhawaldeh,
Osama Shattarah,
Jehad Feras AlSamhori
et al.

Abstract: Key Clinical MessageThis case highlights the importance of considering stent migration as a possible cause of intestinal perforation and the need for prompt surgical intervention.AbstractEndo‐biliary stent displacement is rare but can cause intestinal perforation. An 85‐year‐old woman with a history of ERCPs and biliary stents experienced stomach pain and vomiting. She was diagnosed with small bowel perforation from migrated stents and underwent emergency laparotomy, bowel resection, and tension‐free stapled a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 69 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 11 However, most research on endoscopic treatment for bowel perforation caused by migrating stents focuses on duodenal or distal large bowel perforation. 12 In our case, the patient had signs of mild peritonitis that warranted surgical management, and given the cecal location of the stent and that prepping the patient would pose a risk of dislodging the stent and causing fecal peritonitis, surgical treatment of the perforation was preferred over endoscopic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“… 11 However, most research on endoscopic treatment for bowel perforation caused by migrating stents focuses on duodenal or distal large bowel perforation. 12 In our case, the patient had signs of mild peritonitis that warranted surgical management, and given the cecal location of the stent and that prepping the patient would pose a risk of dislodging the stent and causing fecal peritonitis, surgical treatment of the perforation was preferred over endoscopic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%