2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Telychian (early Silurian) graptolitic shales and the maximum Silurian highstand in the NW Anatolian Palaeozoic terranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences cannot be explained simply by lateral facies changes; hence, they were considered (Göncüoglu et al 1997) as two different Variscan terranes. In the Safranbolu area of the ZT, Paleozoic successions include a low-grade angular unconformity between Wenlock graptolitic shales (Sachanski et al 2010) and late Early Devonian (Emsian) (Göncüoglu et al 2004) carbonates. On the contrary, IT is characterized by continuous deposition during the same time interval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences cannot be explained simply by lateral facies changes; hence, they were considered (Göncüoglu et al 1997) as two different Variscan terranes. In the Safranbolu area of the ZT, Paleozoic successions include a low-grade angular unconformity between Wenlock graptolitic shales (Sachanski et al 2010) and late Early Devonian (Emsian) (Göncüoglu et al 2004) carbonates. On the contrary, IT is characterized by continuous deposition during the same time interval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between the ZT and İT was explained by stratigraphic variations between the two and the presence of a Caledonian time thermal event in the ZT (Bozkaya et al, 2012). In the ZT, Paleozoic successions include a low-grade angular unconformity (Figures 1c and 2) between Wenlock graptolitic shales (Sachanski et al, 2010) and late Early Devonian (Emsian) (Göncüoğlu et al, 2004) carbonates, whereas in the İT, the deposition is continuous during the same time interval.…”
Section: Regional Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1c,d). The Upper Ordovician-Middle Silurian succession is represented by the Karadere, Ketencikdere and Fındıklı formations including graptolitic black and grey shales, with sandstones, siltstones (Schanski et al, 2010) and limestone interlayers (Dean et al, 1997) (Fig. 1d).…”
Section: Lo C At I O N a N D R E G I O N A L G E O Lo G I C A L S E Tmentioning
confidence: 99%