2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.120.241103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Time Afterglow Observations Reveal a Collimated Relativistic Jet in the Ejecta of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817

Abstract: The binary neutron star (BNS) merger GW170817 was the first astrophysical source detected in gravitational waves and multiwavelength electromagnetic radiation. The almost simultaneous observation of a pulse of gamma rays proved that BNS mergers are associated with at least some short gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). However, the gamma-ray pulse was faint, casting doubt on the association of BNS mergers with the luminous, highly relativistic outflows of canonical short GRBs. Here we show that structured jets with a rel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
319
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(344 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
23
319
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When jets plow through dense environments they deposit a fraction of their energy in a hot cocoon (Ramirez-Ruiz et al 2002;Pe'er et al 2006), which may occur in binary neutron star mergers as the ultrarelativistic jet that powers the SGRB pushes through material ejected just before merger (Lazzati et al 2017). GRB 170817A has odd behavior in both prompt and afterglow emission, the origin of which is a matter of some debate (Abbott et al 2017a;Alexander et al 2017Alexander et al , 2018Bromberg et al 2017;Haggard et al 2017;Kasliwal et al 2017;Margutti et al 2017;Mooley et al 2018aMooley et al , 2018bTroja et al 2017Troja et al , 2018aGottlieb et al 2018;Lazzati et al 2018;Lyman et al 2018;Nynka et al 2018;Ruan et al 2018;Veres et al 2018). Possible interpretations include a structured ultrarelativistic jet (e.g., Alexander et al 2018), a jet and cocoon together (e.g., Abbott et al 2017a), or a cocoon model (e.g., Kasliwal et al 2017) where the shock breakout produces the harder peak.…”
Section: The Origin Of the Soft Tailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When jets plow through dense environments they deposit a fraction of their energy in a hot cocoon (Ramirez-Ruiz et al 2002;Pe'er et al 2006), which may occur in binary neutron star mergers as the ultrarelativistic jet that powers the SGRB pushes through material ejected just before merger (Lazzati et al 2017). GRB 170817A has odd behavior in both prompt and afterglow emission, the origin of which is a matter of some debate (Abbott et al 2017a;Alexander et al 2017Alexander et al , 2018Bromberg et al 2017;Haggard et al 2017;Kasliwal et al 2017;Margutti et al 2017;Mooley et al 2018aMooley et al , 2018bTroja et al 2017Troja et al , 2018aGottlieb et al 2018;Lazzati et al 2018;Lyman et al 2018;Nynka et al 2018;Ruan et al 2018;Veres et al 2018). Possible interpretations include a structured ultrarelativistic jet (e.g., Alexander et al 2018), a jet and cocoon together (e.g., Abbott et al 2017a), or a cocoon model (e.g., Kasliwal et al 2017) where the shock breakout produces the harder peak.…”
Section: The Origin Of the Soft Tailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While short GRBs can be observed to cosmological distances, they are believed to be rather tightly beamed, so that only a small fraction of BNS mergers would be accompanied by a gamma ray burst (GRB) counterpart [126]. However, observations of GW170817 imply that the gamma ray burst (GRB) emission is structured [25] with a broader, weak emission, possibly powered by a cocoon [47,127,128]. Since the gamma ray burst (GRB) emission is likely to be essentially concurrent with the merger, it will be difficult to use GW observations to provide advanced warning to gamma ray burst (GRB) satellites.…”
Section: Implication For Em Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one assumes that the emission was intrinsically sub-luminous and quasi-isotropic [58,59]. The second one assumes instead a standard short GRB emission, that was observed off-axis [60]. While at the moment, about a hundred days after the event, both possibilities can explain the data, the analysis of the future time-evolution of the synchrotron emission will ultimately be able to distinguish between these two scenarios, telling therefore if GRB170817A was a standard short GRB seen off-axis or if it belongs to a new class of phenomena [61].…”
Section: The Weak Gamma Emission Of Grb170817a: Was It a Standard Shomentioning
confidence: 99%