2000
DOI: 10.1162/089976600300015484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent Attractors: A Model for Context-Dependent Place Representations in the Hippocampus

Abstract: Cells throughout the rodent hippocampal system show place-specific patterns of firing called place fields, creating a coarse-coded representation of location. The dependencies of this place code--or cognitive map--on sensory cues have been investigated extensively, and several computational models have been developed to explain them. However, place representations also exhibit strong dependence on spatial and behavioral context, and identical sensory environments can produce very different place codes in diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also consistent with the very sparse representations formed in these regions, as indicated by the relatively small number of active place cells in the dentate gyrus for a given environment (Jung and McNaughton, 1993). Previous models have also used dentate gyrus to provide context for CA1 unit activity (Doboli et al, 2000).…”
Section: Power Of the Number Of Intervening States (C-s)supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is also consistent with the very sparse representations formed in these regions, as indicated by the relatively small number of active place cells in the dentate gyrus for a given environment (Jung and McNaughton, 1993). Previous models have also used dentate gyrus to provide context for CA1 unit activity (Doboli et al, 2000).…”
Section: Power Of the Number Of Intervening States (C-s)supporting
confidence: 77%
“…This is also consistent with the very sparse representations formed in these regions, as indicated by the relatively small number of active place cells in the dentate gyrus for a given environment (Jung and McNaughton, 1993). Previous models have also used dentate gyrus to provide context for CA1 unit activity (Doboli et al, 2000).Synaptic modification of region CA3 recurrent connections encodes associations between spiking induced by dentate gyrus input g c and dendritic depolarization caused by input from ECII: Where the matrix W ca3 represents strength of recurrent connections in region CA3 (starting from a small nonzero value) modified by activity in CA3 pyramidal cells. Presynaptic activity a ca3 is assumed to be dominated by spiking induced by mossy fiber inputs from the dentate gyrus, so presynaptic activity can be replaced with the distinct episodic representation formed in the dentate gyrus at each time step g c .…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Neural activity in each of these states is focused on a relatively small, uniquely selected subpopulation of principal cells. Each state of this sort could possess certain (meta-) stability typical of a latent attractor state (Samsonovich and McNaughton 1997;Doboli et al 2000). The most commonly held account of the neural basis of contextual reinstatement is that PFC is used to access information in semantic memory (Shimamura 1995;Moscovitch 1992;Dobbins et al 2002) that is stored in MTL, and not in the hippocampus (Vargha-Khadem et al 1997) nor in PFC (e.g., Sylvester and Shimamura 2002).…”
Section: Understanding Hippocampal Function In Episodic Memory Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, a given CA3 cell will fire in a particular place, but only in a particular context. For an alternate view on context representation, see Doboli et al (2000).…”
Section: Linkage Of Sequences With Context At Perforant Path Inputs Tmentioning
confidence: 99%