2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent class analysis of discordance between results of drug use assessments in the CATIE data

Abstract: Objective The primary aim is to examine concordant/discordant results of drug use assessments in adults with schizophrenia. Methods Latent class analysis and multinomial logistic regression were used to examine concordance/discordance between drug use measures and identify characteristics differentiating participants across classes. Results Four classes – non-users, users, probable users, and RIA discordant –fit best. Age, sex, race/ethnicity, and psychiatric symptoms differed significantly across classes.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the potential for under-reported substance use, our findings may underestimate the actual rates of use (Bahorik et al, 2014). Biomedical measures of drug-use had the largest amount of missing data in the CATIE and recent investigations have cautioned that using multiple measures to confirm substance use may result in overestimates (Johnson et al, 2015). Given these concerns and the study design, we believe our use of self-report substance use is appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the potential for under-reported substance use, our findings may underestimate the actual rates of use (Bahorik et al, 2014). Biomedical measures of drug-use had the largest amount of missing data in the CATIE and recent investigations have cautioned that using multiple measures to confirm substance use may result in overestimates (Johnson et al, 2015). Given these concerns and the study design, we believe our use of self-report substance use is appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%