2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent profiles of problem behavior within learning, peer, and teacher contexts: Identifying subgroups of children at academic risk across the preschool year

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with short-term studies linking social withdrawal with low levels of learning engagement and reduced academic attainment during the preschool years (Bulotsky-Shearer et al, 2012;Fantuzzo et al, 2003;Konold & Pianta, 2005), the present study demonstrated a unique pathway between social withdrawal and literacy skills across three academic years at the start of elementary school. The present model mirrors and supports findings that suggest that social withdrawal may be related to academic skills and learning behaviors at school entry (Dominguez et al, 2010;Luo, Hughes, Liew, & Kwok, 2009).…”
Section: Developmental Modelsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with short-term studies linking social withdrawal with low levels of learning engagement and reduced academic attainment during the preschool years (Bulotsky-Shearer et al, 2012;Fantuzzo et al, 2003;Konold & Pianta, 2005), the present study demonstrated a unique pathway between social withdrawal and literacy skills across three academic years at the start of elementary school. The present model mirrors and supports findings that suggest that social withdrawal may be related to academic skills and learning behaviors at school entry (Dominguez et al, 2010;Luo, Hughes, Liew, & Kwok, 2009).…”
Section: Developmental Modelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In other words, the literacy skills that children had as they started school did not affect their subsequent social withdrawal. One reason for the failure to confirm this hypothesis may have been that the composite items used in the present investigation do not assess emotional states in a manner comparable with other studies (Grills‐Taquechel, Fletcher, Vaughn, & Stuebing, ; Ladd et al., ), and that bidirectional effects would have been better captured with more direct assessments of social withdrawal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This procedure estimates the probability of profile membership and the regression coefficients of the covariates simultaneously, thereby overcoming the potential bias that is caused by poor entropies in directly using the most likely profile membership as a grouping variable (Masyn, 2013). Since the outcome variable (i.e., the latent profile) is categorical, this procedure conducts a (multinomial) logistic regression with one profile as the reference group (Bulotsky-Shearer, Bell, & Dominguez, 2012). We finally added students' CIL achievement as a distal outcome to the LPA regression model (Figure 1).…”
Section: Latent Profile Analysis With Regression and A Distal Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, latent profile analysis has been used to identify different types of at-risk children, based on their similarities in problem behaviors, such as socially and academically disruptive children and socially and academically disengaged children (Bulotsky-Shearer, Bell, & Domínguez, 2012). Subsequent analyses revealed a relation between at-risk profiles and learning trajectories, providing insight into how children with distinct combinations of problem behaviors have different academic growth patterns.…”
Section: Latent Class and Latent Profile Models: New Ways To Understamentioning
confidence: 99%