2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41386-018-0187-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent variable analysis of negative affect and its contributions to neural responses during shock anticipation

Abstract: Negative affect is considered an important factor in the etiology of depression and anxiety, and is highly related to pain. However, negative affect is not a unitary construct. To identify specific targets for treatment development, we aimed to derive latent variables of negative affect and test their unique contributions to affective processing during anticipation of unpredictable, painful shock. Eighty-three subjects (43 with depression and anxiety spectrum disorders and 40 healthy controls) completed self-r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have documented effects of anxiety on neural processing and reporting of pain. 32 , 48 , 64 Pain-related anxiety in ASD could contribute to or arise due to altered neural processing of pain. In ASD, reports of heightened responses in the anterior cingulate during pain anticipation 24 and substantial late phase suppression of the neural pain signature during a painful stimulus 17 are consistent with increased pain-related anxiety and varying profiles of pain sensitivity based on the temporal profile of the stimuli as reported in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have documented effects of anxiety on neural processing and reporting of pain. 32 , 48 , 64 Pain-related anxiety in ASD could contribute to or arise due to altered neural processing of pain. In ASD, reports of heightened responses in the anterior cingulate during pain anticipation 24 and substantial late phase suppression of the neural pain signature during a painful stimulus 17 are consistent with increased pain-related anxiety and varying profiles of pain sensitivity based on the temporal profile of the stimuli as reported in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neural circuits governing trait-like individual differences in dispositional negativity have only recently started to come into focus. Work by our group and others demonstrates that humans and monkeys with a more negative disposition show heightened responses to threatrelevant cues in a number of brain regions, including the amygdala, anterior hippocampus, anterior insula, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), mid-cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and periaqueductal gray (Avery, Clauss, & Blackford, 2016;Cavanagh & Shackman, 2015;Fox & Kalin, 2014b;Fox & Shackman, 2019;Kalin, 2017;Kirlic et al, 2019;Lowery-Gionta, DiBerto, Mazzone, & Kash, 2018;Shackman et al, 2011b;Shackman et al, 2016c). While all of these regions are important, here we focus on the most intensely scrutinized component of this system, the amygdala, a heterogeneous collection of nuclei buried beneath the temporal lobe (Freese & Amaral, 2009; Yilmazer-Hanke, 2012) (Figure 1).…”
Section: Relevance Of the Amygdala To Dispositional Negativitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To be clear, the distinction made here between affect-based conflict and pain- or monetary-based conflict is not meant to suggest that losing money or feeling the unpleasant sensation of pain do not involve affective responses. 21 The distinction motivating the use of affect-based tasks is one of maximizing ecological validity: affective disorders more often involve avoidance of the more complex “emotional pain” induced by socio-emotional cues (e.g., social rejection, losing a job, death). The visual/auditory stimuli used in affect-based AAC tasks are designed to more closely match such cues (e.g., by depicting social interactions mirroring some of those cues) and the emotionally painful responses they evoke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%