2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral buckling of overhanging crane trolley monorails

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Park et al [28] examined the effect of continuous top flange bracing on LTB capacity of simply supported and multi-span beams subject to uniformly distributed and concentrated loads based on the four-node plate element within the finite element program MSC/NASTRAN. Using shell analysis, Ozdemir and Topkaya [29] examined LTB capacity of overhanging monorails under various loading and boundary conditions. Based on a shell element solution and the finite difference method, Serna et al [30] proposed a new moment gradient factor for simply supported beams restrained torsionally at both ends and subject to general loads applied at the shear center.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park et al [28] examined the effect of continuous top flange bracing on LTB capacity of simply supported and multi-span beams subject to uniformly distributed and concentrated loads based on the four-node plate element within the finite element program MSC/NASTRAN. Using shell analysis, Ozdemir and Topkaya [29] examined LTB capacity of overhanging monorails under various loading and boundary conditions. Based on a shell element solution and the finite difference method, Serna et al [30] proposed a new moment gradient factor for simply supported beams restrained torsionally at both ends and subject to general loads applied at the shear center.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essa and Kennedy (1995) have developed a design method for beams in cantilever-suspended span construction, where secondary framing members provide both lateral and torsional restraints to the top flange of the beam. Tanner (1985), Essa and Kennedy (1994), Ozdemir and Topkaya (2006), and Trahair (2008) provide expressions for calculating the buckling resistance of overhanging monorail beams, where the compression flange is unbraced at the support.…”
Section: Built-in Cantileversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that beams, which have a large flexural rigidity in their loaded plane and a small flexural rigidity in the other plane, such as I-section beams and castellated beams, are prone to web distortional buckling [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] and/or lateral-torsional buckling [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] depending on lateral restraint conditions and the slenderness of the flanges and web of the beams. The load, at which the buckling occurs, may be considerably less than the inplane load-carrying capacity of the beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collin et al [3] discussed the lateral-torsional buckling of continuous bridge girders. Özdemir and Topkaya [4] examined the lateral buckling of overhanging crane trolley monorails. Andrade et al [5] studied the lateral-torsional buckling of singly symmetric web-tapered thin-walled I-beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%