1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(81)80228-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral condensation stress in root canals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in accordance with previous studies which have suggested lateral compaction technique as a possible causal factor for VRF [12][13][14]25,28,29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result is in accordance with previous studies which have suggested lateral compaction technique as a possible causal factor for VRF [12][13][14]25,28,29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although the mean value of VRF force F well exceeded the 15-30 N figure generally quoted for clinical situations (Harvey et al, 1981), they found that a spreader load as small as 15 N produced VRF, and 13% of the samples fractured at loads smaller than 35 N. Additionally, partial fracture or dentinal cracks may occur during root canal preparation (Onnink et al, 1994;Shemesh et al, 2009). Such tend to accommodate foreign objects and bacteria (Walton et al, 1984), which may be of a long-term concern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Fractures produced by spreaders have been demonstrated from 1.5 kg to 7.2 kg (14, 15). Clinically useful forces have been shown to be between 1.0 and 3.0 kg (16,17).With the advent of greater taper files, gutta-percha cones of greater taper have been made to better fit the taper of the preparation. Linear resistance in the apical area prevents apical displacement of the filling material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fractures produced by spreaders have been demonstrated from 1.5 kg to 7.2 kg (14,15). Clinically useful forces have been shown to be between 1.0 and 3.0 kg (16,17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%