Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2005.1520077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral control of autonomous vehicle for public urban mobility systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the requested performance about the lateral displacement, that is, 0.25 m to allow the transponders/antenna communication, was satisfied everywhere along the circuit. On the contrary, the robustness request 0.10 m, and the limit on the control effort 7 Nm, that takes into account the actual saturation on the command torque, were not satisfied in many different parts of the test circuit, as described in [19].…”
Section: Test Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, the requested performance about the lateral displacement, that is, 0.25 m to allow the transponders/antenna communication, was satisfied everywhere along the circuit. On the contrary, the robustness request 0.10 m, and the limit on the control effort 7 Nm, that takes into account the actual saturation on the command torque, were not satisfied in many different parts of the test circuit, as described in [19].…”
Section: Test Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was clear (see [19]), from the comparison of the acquired lateral displacement , with the more or less good placement of the transponders on an "ideal" path, which curvature should vary as smoothly as possible, that this misplacement is one of the main problems in following the desired path. This fact is confirmed also by the sharp variations of the acquired signals and in correspondence to any bad placement of transponders.…”
Section: Test Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations