2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-019-3822-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral flow biosensors based on the use of micro- and nanomaterials: a review on recent developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though a large number of graphene-based sensors reported in the literature exhibited good stability and repeatability, performance of some sensors in actual biological samples (such as blood and urine) often failed to achieve the desired detection results, which was mainly due to some non-specificity of biological and chemical molecules during the interfacial reaction of graphene and targets. Although some sample preparations (e.g., separation or preconcentration) are necessary before the final tests for biological samples, however, they always face the limits of complex procedures and are a time-consuming operation [76]. One effective solution to such problems is to develop ultrasensitive and high-specific sensors.…”
Section: Conclusion and Outlooksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though a large number of graphene-based sensors reported in the literature exhibited good stability and repeatability, performance of some sensors in actual biological samples (such as blood and urine) often failed to achieve the desired detection results, which was mainly due to some non-specificity of biological and chemical molecules during the interfacial reaction of graphene and targets. Although some sample preparations (e.g., separation or preconcentration) are necessary before the final tests for biological samples, however, they always face the limits of complex procedures and are a time-consuming operation [76]. One effective solution to such problems is to develop ultrasensitive and high-specific sensors.…”
Section: Conclusion and Outlooksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample-to-answer time for detecting human prostate specific antigen in a drop of blood (20 μL) is 15 min exhibiting a LOD of 0.028 ng/mL (21.4-fold improvement compared to that of conventional LFIA) demonstrating impressively the potential for sensitivity improvement by technological advancements [ 71 ]. The application of innovative reporter agents, e.g., nanozymes [ 72 ], up-converting phosphor technology-based lateral flow assay [ 73 ], antibody-gated indicator delivery systems [ 74 ], surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) based LFIAs [ 75 ] as well as the combination with smartphone based readout [ 76 , 77 ] are other trends for LFIAs [ 78 ]. Tang et al [ 79 ] applied Eu/Tb (III) nanospheres with enhanced fluorescence as labels for anti-idiotypic nanobodies and monoclonal antibodies.…”
Section: Portable Immunoassay Techniques With Multiplexing Capabilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lateral flow-based techniques have been developed for rapid detection of various infectious and analytical agents during the past few years [96] that meets the affordable, sensitive, specific, user-friendly, rapid and robust, equipment-free, and deliverable to end-users (ASSURED) criteria of the world health organization (WHO) [97]. A lot of lateral flow assays with different accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were developed.…”
Section: Lateral Flow-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%