2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017gl073230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral heterogeneity imaged by small‐aperture ScS retrieval from the ambient seismic field

Abstract: Interpreting core‐related body wave traveltimes is challenging for seismologists because Earth's heterogeneities are averaged over thousands of kilometers and the sparsity of earthquake measurements makes these heterogeneities difficult to localize. We show how the ambient seismic wave field can be used to overcome these limitations. We present a regional‐scale analysis of core‐mantle boundary reflections (ScS) under Mexico. We show that body wave arrivals (i.e., P and ScS) are retrieved from higher‐order cros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(126 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using ray theory and stationary-phase arguments, Phm et al (2018) interpreted the spurious phases in global coda correlations as a result of the interferences between specific ray paths. Tkalčić and Phm (2018) inferred the shear properties of the Earth's inner core by modelling a spurious phase related to the J waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using ray theory and stationary-phase arguments, Phm et al (2018) interpreted the spurious phases in global coda correlations as a result of the interferences between specific ray paths. Tkalčić and Phm (2018) inferred the shear properties of the Earth's inner core by modelling a spurious phase related to the J waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structure on the receiver-side of the path can also affect the waveforms we observe here. A large ULVZ is known to exist on the receiver-side beneath northern Mexico (Havens & Revenaugh, 2001;Spica et al, 2017;Thorne et al, 2019), but none of the Pd paths used in this study cross this ULVZ. However, we cannot rule out possible contamination from unknown ULVZs beneath N. America.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our implementation of C 2 , we focus on the nondiffuse part of the energy instead of the scattered wavefield of the EGFs, which is different from C 3 that utilizes the diffuse coda wave energy. The application of C 3 typically succeeds when stable coda waves are available from a dense seismic network (e.g., Froment et al, 2011;Ma & Beroza, 2012;Sheng et al, 2018;Spica et al, 2016Spica et al, , 2017Stehly et al, 2008;Zhang & Yang, 2013). In such cases, the uniformity and diffusivity of the source illuminations can be enhanced through the presence of (near receiver) scatters (Boschi & Weemstra, 2015), which produce a sufficiently diffuse scattering wavefield that is critical for the cancellation of the cross-terms in the correlation functions (Snieder et al, 2008).…”
Section: Comparison Between C 2 and Cmentioning
confidence: 99%