1980
DOI: 10.3208/sandf1972.20.4_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral Load-Deflection Relationships of Piles Subjected to Dynamic Loadings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that a kinematically loaded pile follows all but the details of the free-®eld soil motion (Kagawa & Kraft, 1980;Kavvadas & Gazetas, 1993). Nevertheless, when applying the results of the paper to practical problems, a judicious choice of soil moduli should account for some unavoidable non-linearity and/or disturbance due to pile installation.…”
Section: Beam-on-dynamic-winkler-foundation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recall that a kinematically loaded pile follows all but the details of the free-®eld soil motion (Kagawa & Kraft, 1980;Kavvadas & Gazetas, 1993). Nevertheless, when applying the results of the paper to practical problems, a judicious choice of soil moduli should account for some unavoidable non-linearity and/or disturbance due to pile installation.…”
Section: Beam-on-dynamic-winkler-foundation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support for the third scenario comes from the fact that damage has often been observed too deep to have been caused by loading coming from the pile top, in soils that could not possibly have suffered a severe loss of strength (e.g. Following these early efforts, the problem was analysed by Margason (1975), Blaney et al (1976), Kagawa & Kraft (1980), Flores-Berrones & Whitman (1982), Kaynia & Kausel (1982), Dobry & O'Rourke (1983), Barghouthi (1984), Tazoh et al (1987), Mineiro (1989), Mamoon & Banerjee (1990), Kavvadas & Gazetas (1993), Nikolaou et al (1995), Kaynia & Mahzooni (1996), Guin & Banerjee (1998) Luo & Murono (2001) and others. Analytical and ®eld evidence (Dobry & O'Rourke, 1983;Mizuno, 1987;Tazoh et al, 1987) have associated this type of damage with the presence of strong discontinuities in strength and, especially, stiffness in the soil pro®le.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient Si [13] is a function of the pile flexibility factor EI/E S L 4 , and pile slenderness ratio Lid, being E s the Young's modulus of the soil. In the hypothesis of linear soil behaviour, G s coincides with the small-strain shear modulus Go.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among approximated approaches, the methods based on the Winkler foundation model [9][10][11] [12][13][14][15] by using the approach of the unit load transfer curves (also known asp-y curves), often confining soil nonlinearity in an inner field around the pile [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the same approach, Novak et al [2] reported closed-form solutions for the real and imaginary parts of the disk dynamic stiffness in terms of the elastic properties of the soil medium. Kagawa and Kraft [3] presented a different approach for the calculation of spring stiffness on the basis of work equivalence. The damping coefficient was calculated using a so-called strip model, carrying elastic waves emanating from the vibrating disk, as shown in Figure 1(a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%