2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06021-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral meniscal slope negatively affects post-operative anterior tibial translation at 1 year after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Abstract: Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between posterior tibial slope and meniscal slope over postoperative anterior tibial translation during the first 18 months after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The main hypothesis was that PTS and MS would be positively correlated with post-operative ATT-SSD after ACL reconstruction. Methods Patients (28 males and 15 females) with confirmed ACL tears were selected from an in-house registry and included if they were over 16 y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 27 In particular, a steeper lateral tibial slope has been associated with increased ATT in the ACL-injured knee, although the results have varied widely. 16 , 28 Because the ACL is the primary passive restraint against ATT, increased translation has been shown to induce greater ACL loading stress subsequently. 29 Similarly, a decreased LFC index has been suggested to be associated with increased gliding of the LFC over the LTP, thereby resulting in a greater pivoting mechanism and increased ACL loading stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 27 In particular, a steeper lateral tibial slope has been associated with increased ATT in the ACL-injured knee, although the results have varied widely. 16 , 28 Because the ACL is the primary passive restraint against ATT, increased translation has been shown to induce greater ACL loading stress subsequently. 29 Similarly, a decreased LFC index has been suggested to be associated with increased gliding of the LFC over the LTP, thereby resulting in a greater pivoting mechanism and increased ACL loading stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess potential anatomic risk factors, previously recognized MRI risk factors associated with ACL injury were analyzed, including the notch width index ( Fig 2 A), 12 notch angle ( Fig 2 A), femoral notch morphology ( Fig 2 B), 13 alpha angle, 14 posterior tibial slope ( Fig 3 ), 15 meniscal slope ( Fig 3 ), 16 and LFC index, 7 as described in Table 1 . All measurement methods have previously shown excellent reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.89-0.99) 7 , 14 , 17 and were performed by an experienced orthopaedic research fellow (H.D.V.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of ATT is usually measured on MRI [29, 34], and therefore, L‐ATT and M‐ATT can be obtained. In some patients who underwent ACL injury, the L‐ATT and M‐ATT were not always consistent, and the L‐ATT was usually greater than the M‐ATT in most cases [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that a greater lateral MS may indicate a greater risk of injury, although there was no association between medial or lateral PTS and ACL injury [17]. Tradati et al investigated the relationship between MS and ATT using MRI and a motorized laximeter in 43 patients 1 year after ACL reconstruction [34]. They reported that ATT was significantly correlated with lateral MS ( r = 0.63; P < 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size was based upon variability in knee AP translation and knee rotation during dynamic activities as measured using dynamic biplane radiography (DBR) [11], and previously reported variability in tibial [27] and meniscal slope [34]. Given 38 knees, this study was powered to detect associations between kinematics and anatomy that have effect sizes from medium to large [7] ( ρ = 0.46 to 0.52 based upon smallest and largest reported variabilities, respectively).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%