2013
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.243229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral Wedge Insoles as a Conservative Treatment for Pain in Patients With Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
80
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
80
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the size of effects on pain and function varies, depending on the type of control intervention that is used. Differences in effect sizes based on RCT designs are consistent with a recent meta-analysis of lateral heel wedges for medial knee osteoarthritis (8), and largely influences the conclusions that can be drawn from such meta-analyses. Clinical trial designs that compare valgus bracing to standard care without a control orthosis emphasize external validity and might be considered more clinically relevant, regardless of the potential mechanisms at work (including placebo effects).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the size of effects on pain and function varies, depending on the type of control intervention that is used. Differences in effect sizes based on RCT designs are consistent with a recent meta-analysis of lateral heel wedges for medial knee osteoarthritis (8), and largely influences the conclusions that can be drawn from such meta-analyses. Clinical trial designs that compare valgus bracing to standard care without a control orthosis emphasize external validity and might be considered more clinically relevant, regardless of the potential mechanisms at work (including placebo effects).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…If so, conventional descriptors for effect sizes (37) suggest moderate improvements in both pain and function with valgus bracing, although the relatively large 95% CIs around those point estimates indicate that considerable uncertainty remains (Figure 2). Additionally, when translated into the difference between groups for improvements in WOMAC pain and function scores (8,38), the upper ends of the 95% CIs include values that would likely be considered clinically important (5 of a maximum 20 for pain, and 16 of a maximum 68 for function).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Internationally, some guidelines issue a conditional recommendation (16,17), while others do not recommend use of lateral wedge insoles on the basis of equivocal evidence of any benefit on pain or knee function (18). A recent meta-analysis demonstrated an effect of lateral wedge insoles on pain outcomes below the minimally clinical important difference for OA (19). However, to our knowledge, there remains no comprehensive meta-analysis of their effect on biomechanical risk factors for knee OA progression, such as knee load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a placebo-controlled trial found a valgus knee brace to be more effective than a neutral brace [11]. Other studies concluded that a laterally wedged insole may be no more effective than the neutral equivalent [2,20] and that a neutral insole can reduce the load of the medial compartment [9,14]. However, a Cochrane review rated the evidence as ''low quality'' that both the valgus knee brace and laterally wedged insole have benefits in the treatment of symptomatic medial knee OA [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%