Laterality judgment performance between people with chronic pain and pain-free individuals. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ravat, Sadiya; Olivier, Benita; Gillion, Nadia; Lewis, Francoise

doi:10.1080/09593985.2019.1570575

Cited by 23 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The LJT changes reported here were less significant than those reported in previous studies in patients with chronic pain (Breckenridge et al., 2019; Ravat et al., 2019). In fact, our patients had similar RT and ACC than HC and presented only a relative alteration of the identification of foot laterality in comparison with hand.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 91%

“…Thus, changes in LJT outcomes, in terms of RT and/or accuracy (ACC), are generally considered to reflect disturbances of body schema processing (Moseley, 2004;Parsons, 1987Parsons, , 2001). Alteration of LJT was reported in different chronic pain conditions (Breckenridge et al, 2019;Ravat et al, 2019), but few studies have included patients with neuropathic (phantom limb pain, plexus avulsion) (Moseley, 2006;Reinersmann et al, 2010) or mixed pain (carpal tunnel syndrome) (Schmid & Coppieters, 2012). In addition, these studies compared patients with neuropathic pain to HC or patients with other chronic pain conditions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has been suggested that ACC may reflect our ability to manoeuvre a body part mentally, whereas RT reflects the total time taken to select laterality, mentally manoeuvre a body part and make the final decision (Bray & Moseley, 2011). However, this interpretation remains a matter of debate, and changes in both these measurements are generally considered to reflect body schema disturbances (Breckenridge et al., 2019; Ravat et al., 2019). Other interpretations of LJT results have been considered, including the possibility that increases in RT are related to chronic underuse (associated with a form of pseudo‐neglect) of the painful limb and/or to unspecific attentional bias induced by pain (Moseley, 2004).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…one hand or foot) correspond to the left or right side of the body, a task requiring an intact body schema (Parsons, 1987). Most of the studies that have used LJT to assess the relationships between pain and body schema were performed in patients with musculoskeletal pain syndromes (Breckenridge, Ginn, Wallwork, & McAuley, 2019; Ravat, Olivier, Gillion, & Lewis, 2019). Other studies have reported alterations to the body schema in patients with neurological lesions, including patients with stroke, limb amputation and SCI in particular (Curtze, Otten, & Postema, 2010; Fiori et al., 2014; Nico, Daprati, Rigal, Parsons, & Sirigu, 2004; Sirigu et al, 1996), but the relationships between these alterations and neuropathic pain were not specifically investigated.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Interplay between body schema, visuospatial perception and pain in patients with spinal cord injury

Osinski

Martinez

Bensmaïl

et al. 2020

European Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

More than half of the patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) suffer chronic neuropathic pain syndromes (Burke, Fullen, Stokes, & Lennon, 2017; Siddall & Middleton, 2015). The mechanisms of neuropathic pain, particularly for below-level pain, remain poorly understood, but may involve the reorganization of the somatosensory systems and changes in body representations related to the massive deafferentation associated with SCI (Jutzeler, Curt, & Kramer, 2015; Osinski, Acapo, Bensmail, Bouhassira, & Martinez, 2019). In recent years, several studies have highlighted the interactions between pain and body representations (i.e. body image and/or body schema) (Haggard,

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 91%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Interplay between body schema, visuospatial perception and pain in patients with spinal cord injury

Osinski

Martinez

Bensmaïl

et al. 2020

European Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The JBI Institute is an international research centre, established in 1996, which has a range of critical appraisal tools and training to enhance evidence-based health care. JBI critical appraisal tools are widely used in systematic reviews [71, 72], and there is a dedicated online journal (JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports) which publishes systematic reviews which have used the JBI methodology (www.ovid.com/site/catalog/journals/13819.jsp). This present systematic review identified 14 publications for final inclusion and evidence appraisal.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk factors for acute abdominal pain (colic) in the adult horse: A scoping review of risk factors, and a systematic review of the effect of management-related changes

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Acute abdominal pain (colic) is the most common reason for emergency veterinary treatment in the horse. Consolidation of data through a systematic review is important to inform evidence-based medicine and clinical guidelines, but there are currently no published systematic reviews on colic in the horse. The aim of this study was to identify, categorize and appraise the evidence on factors associated with increased risk of developing abdominal pain (colic) due to gastrointestinal disease in the adult horse. A scoping review was performed to identify and categorize evidence on all risk factors for colic. A systematic review of management-related risk factors was then performed following PRISMA guidelines. Both searches were conducted in Medline, CAB Abstracts and Web of Science databases, and publications were assessed against inclusion and exclusion criteria. For the scoping review, study and participant characteristics of included publications and key results were extracted and tabulated. For the systematic review, cohort, case-control or cross-sectional studies investigating acute abdominal pain in horses within two weeks of management changes were assessed. Study characteristics, participant characteristics and study results of included publications for the systematic review were extracted and tabulated. Included publications were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools for cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies. The scoping review search identified 3,756 publications. Fifty eight studies met final inclusion criteria, and 22 categories of risk factors were identified. These were grouped into three broad areas: horse-related factors, management-related factors and environment-related factors. The largest body of evidence related to management change. The systematic review of management change identified 410 publications: 14 met inclusion criteria for analysis. These consisted of one cohort, eight case-control and five cross-sectional studies. The studies were conducted between 1990–2008, and the majority of studies were located in the USA (8/14) or UK (3/14). The risk factors related to management change that were assessed were feed, carer, exercise, pasture, water and housing. The largest bodies of evidence for increased risk of colic associated with management change were changes in feed (5/14 publications) and recent change in housing (3/14). Most studies (8/14) did not meet the JBI criterion on confounding factors. There was marked heterogeneity of study methodologies and measures. This is the first study to use a combined scoping and systematic review to analyse evidence for modifiable risk factors for a common condition in the horse. It provides a comprehensive review that will be a key resource for researchers, veterinary practitioners and horse owners. It identified modifiable risk factors associated with an increased risk of colic which should be a key target for preventative health programmes. The findings from the critical appraisal were used to develop rec...

show abstract

On the body‐mind nexus in chronic musculoskeletal pain: A scoping review

Oliveira

Garrido

Bernardes

2022

European Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and objective: Bodily experience disturbances are frequent among chronic musculoskeletal pain patients and associated with important painrelated psychosocial outcomes (e.g., disability, quality of life). However, the relationship between bodily experience and the psychological dimensions of chronic pain (e.g., affective, cognitive) has only recently garnered attention. This scoping review aimed to identify trends and gaps in research on the nexus between body awareness, body image, and body schema, and psychological processes/outcomes in adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain to inform future directions for r esearch and practice. Databases and data treatment:This study was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's guidelines and PRISMA-ScR recommendations. Keywords related to body awareness/body image/body schema and pain were searched on PsycInfo and PubMed from database inception until 16 February 2021; 2045 articles were screened, and 41 met the inclusion criteria (i.e., primary quantitative studies investigating body awareness/body image/body schema in relation to pain-related psychological outcomes/processes in chronic musculoskeletal pain). Results:The referred bodily experience constructs have been inconsistently defined. Body awareness was the most investigated construct, with consistent operationalization strategies. The links between body schema/body image and pain-related psychological processes/outcomes are still under-investigated. Most studies examined the role of bodily experience as a correlate/predictor of psychological outcomes/processes; overall, a better relationship with one's own body was associated with better pain-related psychological outcomes/processes. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the relevance of further investigating body-mind relations in musculoskeletal pain and the development of therapies designed to improve the bodily experience within multidisciplinary treatment programmes. Suggestions for future research are discussed. Significance: This scoping review identifies trends/gaps in current research on the relationship between body awareness/body image/body schema and pain-related psychological processes/outcomes in adults with musculoskeletal pain. Overall, findings suggest that better bodily experiences are associated to lower fear-avoidance beliefs, better self-regulation strategies and better chronic pain adjustment, being important targets in pain management interventions.

show abstract

Laterality judgment performance between people with chronic pain and pain-free individuals. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cited by 23 publications

References 57 publications

Interplay between body schema, visuospatial perception and pain in patients with spinal cord injury

Interplay between body schema, visuospatial perception and pain in patients with spinal cord injury

Risk factors for acute abdominal pain (colic) in the adult horse: A scoping review of risk factors, and a systematic review of the effect of management-related changes

On the body‐mind nexus in chronic musculoskeletal pain: A scoping review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About