1965
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(65)90028-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateralized deficits in complex visual discrimination and bilateral transfer of reminiscence following unilateral temporal lobectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AIthough the longer response latency of the RT group relative to other subject groups was not obtained for the same tasks in the two experiments, the fact that it was evident in both studies would argue against it being spurious. AIthough Frisk and Milner (1991) suggested that the slowed response time of the RT ( :( \ 41 subjects was secondary to the more general visual-perceptual deficit associated with such les ions (Kimura, 1963;LansdeIl, 1968;Meier & French, 1965;Milner, 1958), the results of the present investigation argue against this explanation, since a similar deficit was found in the auditory modality. It is also unlikely that the longer response latencies are simply due to an impainllent in motor control caused by the surgery: the effect was obtained not only for the hand contralateral to the lesion, but also for the ipsilateral one (that is, for judgements of both plausibility and implausibility).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…AIthough the longer response latency of the RT group relative to other subject groups was not obtained for the same tasks in the two experiments, the fact that it was evident in both studies would argue against it being spurious. AIthough Frisk and Milner (1991) suggested that the slowed response time of the RT ( :( \ 41 subjects was secondary to the more general visual-perceptual deficit associated with such les ions (Kimura, 1963;LansdeIl, 1968;Meier & French, 1965;Milner, 1958), the results of the present investigation argue against this explanation, since a similar deficit was found in the auditory modality. It is also unlikely that the longer response latencies are simply due to an impainllent in motor control caused by the surgery: the effect was obtained not only for the hand contralateral to the lesion, but also for the ipsilateral one (that is, for judgements of both plausibility and implausibility).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Studies of humans with unilateral (Biederman, Gerhardstein, Cooper, & Nelson, 1997;Ellis, Young, & Critchley, 1989;Greenlee, Lang, Mergner, & Seeger, 1995;Greenlee, Richewski, Mergner, & Seeger, 1993;Kimura, 1963;Lansdell, 1968;Meier & French, 1965;Milner, 1958;Milner, 1968;Milner, 1990) or bilateral (Damasio, Damasio, Tranel, & Brandt, 1990;Damasio, Damasio, & Van Hoesen, 1982) temporal lobectomies have demonstrated profound effects on visual learning and memory, particularly when tested with object, pattern, and face recognition. Although this literature has emphasized the learning-and memory-related nature of these deªcits, it remains possible that they were due in part to perceptual disruptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conclusion seems warranted even if the Object Assembly score reduction reflected an artifact resulting from selective differences in construction between the WAIS and W-B performance scales. Additional support of such a deficit derives from evidence of selective impairment after right temporal lobectomy in the ability to discriminate between fragmented concentric circle patterns (6) and adds credence to the hypothesis that the deficit constitutes a loss in visual discriminability which arises as a direct function of stimulus complexity rather than the level of nonverbal cognition required by visually guided tasks.…”
Section: Manfred J Meirr and Lyle A Frenchmentioning
confidence: 82%