1986
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.23.3.556-559.1986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latex agglutination test for detecting feline panleukopenia virus, canine parvovirus, and parvoviruses of fur animals

Abstract: A latex agglutination (LA) test for the detection of parvoviruses of fur animals, cats, and dogs was developed, and its sensitivity and specificity were compared with those of hemagglutination (HA) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Tissue culture isolation was used to confirm the specificity results. Fecal samples from various sources were tested, including specimens from raccoon dogs and mink which were experimentally infected with parvoviruses by oral exposure. LA compared favorably with the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agglutination assays have been tested for CPV and have traditionally used latex beads coated with monoclonal antibodies (20,22). These assays have been found to be useful for CPV antigen detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agglutination assays have been tested for CPV and have traditionally used latex beads coated with monoclonal antibodies (20,22). These assays have been found to be useful for CPV antigen detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of different diagnostic methods for FPV infection have been described, including virus isolation, latex agglutination, immunochromatographic tests, electron microscopy, ELISA, and PCR (Veijalainen and Neuvonen, 1986;Kraft, 1995a, 1995b;Ikeda and Miyazawa, 1998;Esfandiari and Klingeborn, 2000;Decaro and Desario, 2008;Digangi and Gray, 2011;Lane and Brettschneider, 2016). These methods are generally available for most viruses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, a diagnosis of CPV is based on clinical signs, which include vomiting and diarrhea; however, a definitive diagnosis is difficult because these symptoms are common to other enteric diseases (Elia et al, 2007;Hirasawa et al, 1994). Conventional detection methods such as electron microscopy (Teramoto et al, 1984), virus isolation (Mochizuki et al, 1993), latex agglutination (Veijalainen et al, 1986), hemagglutination (Mochizuki et al, 1993;Teramoto et al, 1984), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Drane et al, 1994;Teramoto et al, 1984) have been developed for the detection of CPV, and all are effective and accurate. Molecular detection techniques, including PCR (Mochizuki et al, 1993), real-time PCR (Decaro et al, 2005), nested PCR (Hirasawa et al, 1994), and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (Cho et al, 2006;Mukhopadhyay et al, 2012) have also been used to diagnose CPV, although the sensitivity and specificity of these techniques are variable; however, a major drawback is that these methods are both laborious and time-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%