2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2010.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latin American anthropometrics, past and present—An overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Peru and Colombia average heights were much lower (163-165 cm) in the early 19th century, still sizable by European standards. Mexican heights probably fell in between (see Baten and Carson, 2010 for an overview). For Mexico, other evidence supports the inverted U-curve evolution of real wages.…”
Section: Interpretation: the Other Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Peru and Colombia average heights were much lower (163-165 cm) in the early 19th century, still sizable by European standards. Mexican heights probably fell in between (see Baten and Carson, 2010 for an overview). For Mexico, other evidence supports the inverted U-curve evolution of real wages.…”
Section: Interpretation: the Other Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature on Ibero-American anthropometric history can be seen inMeisel and Vega (2007), Martínez Carrión (2009),Baten and Carson (2010), and López-Alonso (2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past 15 years there have been studies published on the anthropometric history of Mexico that examine the second half of the 18 th century and the early part of the 19 th century (Challú 2009(Challú , 2010Dobado-1 For individual country studies, for Mexico see López-Alonso and Porras Condey (2003); for Colombia, Meisel et al (2007); Vega 2007a, 2007b;Acosta and Meisel 2013;Baten and Baltzer, 2008;Salvatore et al 2010;for Guatemala Rios 2009;for Brazil, Monasterio et al (2010); Frank and Shelhoub (2006); Franken (this issue); for Chile, Núñez and Pérez (2015); Llorca-Jaña et al (2018); for comparative studies see Baten et al (2009); Baten and Carson (2010); Baltzer and Baten (2008); Challú and Silva-Castañeda, (2016).…”
Section: Anthropometric History Of Mexico: a Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%