It has been well documented that rural students attend college at a rate lower than urban students as well as below the national average, despite the fact that rural students tend to graduate from high school at a higher rate than students in urban schools. Previous scholarship has attributed this post-secondary educational pattern to individual factors such as student aspirations and attainment as well as cultural and social capital at the familial level. Less attention has been given to the role of community context and the capital present at the community level in shaping rural student's college-going practices and behaviors. This study utilized life history methodology to explore how two White women from rural areas understood how their home communities shaped their college-going practices and behaviors. Findings suggest that rural women's college-going is heavily influenced by rural community capital and its interaction with larger systems and structures such as gender/patriarchy and urbanormativity. Implications for research recommend further exploration of the roles of natural and built capital in understanding college-going, especially for rural students. Implications for policy focus on the role of dual enrollment programs and broadband internet access in shaping college-going practices and behaviors in rural communities. CHAPTER ONE PROBLEM, PURPOSE & SIGNIFICANCE In this chapter, I provide an introduction to my study. I begin with a summation of my statement of inquiry. I then provide an overview of the purpose of the study and conclude with discussion of the significance of the study. Statement of Inquiry Access to higher education in the United States has been restricted and limited to various populations since the creation of the first universities in the mid to late 1600s (Thelin, 2004). Admission policies have historically prohibited people of Color, women, and students from low socioeconomic status from participating in and earning a higher education (Thelin, 2004; Rudolph, 1991). Although these restrictive policies are no longer legal, higher education scholarship has shown that structural challenges still exist that prevent students from equitably accessing higher education because of race/racism, gender/sexism, and socioeconomic status/poverty (Bergerson, 2009) as well as citizenship status (Gildersleeve, 2010; Hernandez, 2013). Less attention, though, has been given to the role of place as a challenge to accessing higher education and the ways in which place informs social systems and identities as they relate to post-secondary educational opportunity. In critically discussing the role of geography, Reynolds (2004) posited: While race, class, and gender have long been viewed as the most significant markers of identity, geographic identity is often ignored or taken for granted. However, identities take root from particular sociogeographical intersections, reflecting where a person comes from and, to some extent, directing where she is allowed to go. (p.11)