2010
DOI: 10.1177/0013124510370943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latino Parents’ Choice of Magnet School: How School Choice Differs Across Racial and Ethnic Boundaries

Abstract: Historically, magnet schools have served predominantly Black and Anglo populations. Consequently, little research exists on Latino parent’s engagement in school choice and their patterns of participation. Magnet schools are increasingly part of the landscape for improving school achievement for all students. Yet Latino enrollment rates in magnet schools fall short of their representation within most urban populations as well the population as a whole. This article explores the factors that influence Latino par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Latino magnet school choosers in Nashville, Tennessee, considered academic factors and safety to be high priorities when choosing a school (Taylor et al, 2010). A survey-based study of low-income parents in Washington, DC shows that in the beginning of the journey, private voucher users indicate that safety factors and school characteristics-such as religion, foreign languages, ethnic diversity, and school location-were the most relevant parent motivations for school choice (Stewart & Wolf, 2014).…”
Section: Preferences For Discipline and Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Latino magnet school choosers in Nashville, Tennessee, considered academic factors and safety to be high priorities when choosing a school (Taylor et al, 2010). A survey-based study of low-income parents in Washington, DC shows that in the beginning of the journey, private voucher users indicate that safety factors and school characteristics-such as religion, foreign languages, ethnic diversity, and school location-were the most relevant parent motivations for school choice (Stewart & Wolf, 2014).…”
Section: Preferences For Discipline and Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top reason for the creation of magnet schools was to promote racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic student diversity (Blank, 1983;Butler, Carr, Toma, & Zimmer, 2013;DOE, 2004;Rossell, 1991;Smrekar, 2009;Smrekar & Honey, 2015;Taylor, Phillips, & Goldring, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jacobs (2011) provides a helpful framework for examining this question. Haynes, Phillips, and Goldring (2010) find that Latinos were much less likely than parents of other races to hear about schools from their social network. Parents typically learn about school options through their social networks (e.g., Goldring & Phillips, 2008;Stewart & Wolf, 2012;Witte, 2000).…”
Section: Why Do Parents Make Different Choices?mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Because low-income and minority parents have less stable and smaller social networks (Schneider, Teske, & Marschall, 2000;Smrekar & Goldring, 1999), disadvantaged parents might struggle to gather the necessary information to make informed decisions (e.g., Henig, 1994;Stewart & Wolf, 2011). Parents often claim that academic factors and educational quality are the main reason for using school choice (e.g., Finn, Manno, & Vanourek, 2000;Haynes et al, 2010;Howell & Peterson, 2006;Kleitz, Weiher, Tedin, & Matland, 2000;Martinez et al, 1995;Witte, 2000). Deficiencies in social networks cannot easily be replaced by other sources of information.…”
Section: Why Do Parents Make Different Choices?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transportation is provided at no cost to families to almost all magnet schools. They emerged in the US as one means to eliminate, reduce, and prevent minority group isolation [35]. They tend to perform well and have a more diverse student population than neighborhood schools.…”
Section: Case Study and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%