2012
DOI: 10.3354/meps10025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latitudinal trends in habitat quality of shallow‑water flatfish nurseries

Abstract: The habitat quality of European shallow-water nurseries was studied for 3 common flatfish species based on juvenile growth conditions. Field growth of 0-group plaice Pleuronectes platessa, flounder Platichthys flesus and sole Solea solea, from both published and unpublished studies, was compared with maximum growth predicted by a bioenergetics model based on the dynamic energy budget theory. In plaice and flounder, realized growth ratio decreased consistently during the growing season in most of the nurseries … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, there is no strong support for size-selective predation by fishes and birds on 0-group plaice in summer (van der Veer et al, 1997). The results of this study are also in line with previous observations for the Balgzand intertidal (Teal et al, 2008;van der Veer et al, 2010), as well as for a number of European nurseries (Ciotti et al, 2010;Freitas et al, 2012;Ciotti et al, 2013a,b). This again suggests that variations in food conditions and hence growth potential cannot explain the shifts in habitat use between 1986 and 2009.…”
Section: Habitat Qualitysupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, there is no strong support for size-selective predation by fishes and birds on 0-group plaice in summer (van der Veer et al, 1997). The results of this study are also in line with previous observations for the Balgzand intertidal (Teal et al, 2008;van der Veer et al, 2010), as well as for a number of European nurseries (Ciotti et al, 2010;Freitas et al, 2012;Ciotti et al, 2013a,b). This again suggests that variations in food conditions and hence growth potential cannot explain the shifts in habitat use between 1986 and 2009.…”
Section: Habitat Qualitysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In those cases where size distributions overlapped or were close together (mostly in 1986 due to the presence of I-and II-group plaice), sagittal otoliths were routinely checked for the presence of annual rings by eye. Numbers caught were first corrected for size-selective mesh and catch efficiency according to Kuipers (1975) and Dapper (1978) for the 2-m beam trawl, and after Bergman et al (1989) (2001,2009,2010) and Freitas et al (2010), and the full procedure is described in Freitas et al (2012). In a rather constant environment (see Kooijman, 2010), the model equations describing the dynamics of the state variables (reserve, structure and reproductive buffer) simplify greatly and in case of growth, become mathematically equivalent to the Von Bertalanffy growth model (Kooijman, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on various flatfish species in different nurseries has confirmed 189 robustness of the DEB parameters (Freitas et al, 2012). …”
Section: Side 154mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…At larger spatial scales, temporal variability in growth among various flatfish species has also been found (Amara, 2003;Fonseca et al, 2006;Hurst & Abookire, 2006;van der Veer et al, 2010;Freitas et al, 2012Freitas et al, , 2016Ciotti et al, 2013a,b). Growth varies not only among nursery areas but also among cohorts or age groups of a given species and even among subcohorts during settlement (Fonseca et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%