Proceedings of 37th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2019) 2020
DOI: 10.22323/1.363.0228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice $B \to D^{(*)}$ form factors, $R(D^{(*)})$, and $|V_{cb}|$

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2a shows the local Nu number along the heated wall for computational and experimental results [5,26,27]. A circular free jet shape is modeled at z/D = 6 and Re = 23,000, the inlet flow is considered as a fully developed flow at the heated wall, and the thermal flow was fixed at Q = 7.54 kW•m -2 .…”
Section: Numerical Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 2a shows the local Nu number along the heated wall for computational and experimental results [5,26,27]. A circular free jet shape is modeled at z/D = 6 and Re = 23,000, the inlet flow is considered as a fully developed flow at the heated wall, and the thermal flow was fixed at Q = 7.54 kW•m -2 .…”
Section: Numerical Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A remarkable number of researchers have investigated the jet impingement features in confined conditions [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Previous research has highlighted attempts to increase the heat transfer of confined synthetic air jets using ducting plates with the distance from the jet exit assisting to draw cold air in with the jet flow [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the use of QCD factorization to describe nonleptonic decays is under scrutiny due to observed large discrepancies with experimental results. Summaries and further details can be found, for example, in [1][2][3] and in recent reviews of lattice calculations [4][5][6][7]. Currently no single quantity is considered significant and trustworthy enough to claim a smoking gun signal for new physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%