2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice contraction and lattice deformation of UO 2 and ThO 2 doped with Gd 2 O 3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A bond valence sum (BVS) assessment was made to evaluate the validity of the introduction of a cluster distortion parameter δ. , The BVS analysis has been successfully applied in the investigation of complex uranium oxides and fluorides for more than 60 years already. With the atomic coordinates in the expanded unit cell (see Table ), BVS calculations were performed for different values of the deformation parameter δ and with the parameter sets ( R 0 and b ) published by Zachariasen . The parameter sets published by Brese and O’Keeffe, and Brown, provided almost identical results. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bond valence sum (BVS) assessment was made to evaluate the validity of the introduction of a cluster distortion parameter δ. , The BVS analysis has been successfully applied in the investigation of complex uranium oxides and fluorides for more than 60 years already. With the atomic coordinates in the expanded unit cell (see Table ), BVS calculations were performed for different values of the deformation parameter δ and with the parameter sets ( R 0 and b ) published by Zachariasen . The parameter sets published by Brese and O’Keeffe, and Brown, provided almost identical results. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data are fitted to linear equations to determine the radii of U 4,8 , Ln 3,8 , and U 5,8 ,. The experimental data are from (La) Hill (Hill, 1962), Stadlbauer et al (Stadlbauer et al, 1974), Preiur et al (Prieur et al, 2018); (Pr) Yamashita et al (Yamashita et al, 1985); (Nd) Une and Oguma (Une and Oguma, 1983a), Ohmichi et al (Ohmichi et al, 1981), Fukushima et al (Fukushima et al, 1983); (Gd) Baena et al (Baena et al, 2015), Ohmichi et al (Ohmichi et al, 1981), Cardinaels et al (Cardinaels et al, 2012), Leyva et al (Leyva et al, 2002), Fukushima et al (Fukushima et al, 1982), Hirai and Ishimoto (Hirai and Ishimoto, 1991), Soldati et al (Soldati et al, 2016). (Yamashita et al, 1985) (circles and squares are the samples synthesized at 1623 K), Lynds et al (Lynds et al, 1963) (open down triangles), Belbeoch (Belbeoch et al, 1964) (shaded down triangles), Matsui and Naito (Matsui and Naito, 1975) (open up triangles), Schaner (Schaner, 1960) (left triangles), Grønvold (Grønvold, 1955) (shaded up triangles).…”
Section: Thermodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This potential was therefore selected for this study; its short range parametrization is reported in Table 1. In UO2, hole electronic defects are generally thought to maintain the system charge neutral [32]. In the present study, holes were described as localised on the uranium sublattice as uranium atoms with a (5+) charge.…”
Section: Atomic Scale Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 84%