1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01321717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lattice points in large convex bodies

Abstract: In this article we investigate the number A (t) of lattice points in x/t ~ where is a convex body in R s (s/> 3) which has a smooth boundary with nonzero Gaussian curvature throughout, and t is a large real parameter. We establish an asymptotic formula A (t) = Vt s/2 + 0 (t x(s~) (V the volume of ~) which improves upon a classic result of E. HLAWXA [5].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Jarník [14] established the bound O(t −d/2+ε ) for the relative error, with any ε > 0, for almost all ellipsoids with axes parallel to the coordinate axes. For general convex domains with non-vanishing curvature on the boundary, W. Müller [22] proved that ∆ Ω (t) = O(t −2+λ(d)+ε ), where λ(d) = (d + 4)/(d 2 + d + 2), if d ≥ 5, λ(4) = 6/17 and λ(3) = 20/43, improving on earlier results by Krätzel and Nowak [19]. For planar domains, Huxley [11] obtained this estimate with λ(2) = 46/73, which implies the relative error O(t −100/73 (log t) 315/146 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…For example, Jarník [14] established the bound O(t −d/2+ε ) for the relative error, with any ε > 0, for almost all ellipsoids with axes parallel to the coordinate axes. For general convex domains with non-vanishing curvature on the boundary, W. Müller [22] proved that ∆ Ω (t) = O(t −2+λ(d)+ε ), where λ(d) = (d + 4)/(d 2 + d + 2), if d ≥ 5, λ(4) = 6/17 and λ(3) = 20/43, improving on earlier results by Krätzel and Nowak [19]. For planar domains, Huxley [11] obtained this estimate with λ(2) = 46/73, which implies the relative error O(t −100/73 (log t) 315/146 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…There are some results for the number of lattice points in convex bodies provided that for all points on the bound the Gaussian curvature is positive throughout. See the papers of E. Hlawka [4] and W. G. Nowak and the author [8], [9]. K. Haberland [3] considered also the case that on the bound are isolated points with Gaussian curvature zero provided that the tangential plane is rational.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. This estimate however is not sharp, and several authors beginning with van der Corput have obtained improvements for the case of nonvanishing Gauß curvature; see the monographs by Krätzel [18] and Huxley [14], and in particular the papers by Krätzel and Nowak [20] and recent improvements by W. Müller [22] for results on general convex bodies with nonvanishing curvature in higher dimensions. In [24, I], [25] Randol obtained better estimates for the case of convex domains in the plane with finite type boundary; these are sharp for Ω = {x :…”
Section: A Lattice Point Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%